growstuff
Martin Lewis posted this on Twitter:
"I wouldn't ever want to be Chancellor for all the money in the world. Incredibly tough job. Impossible ask. Especially over the last decade.
How do you try to piece together the mis-shapen, independent jigsaw pieces of consumer issues, business, the economy, bond markets, stock markets, job markets, world economies, tariffs, and more.
People often lambast Chancellors as 'unqualified' but no one is qualified to do such a broad job. Ultimately it is a political role for someone with hopefully some understanding of wider economic, financial and consumer issues.
We have to give some respect to those who try, even if we disagree with their decisions. As no one will ever get it all right."
He has a point.
Martin Lewis is off the nark 
Really, all you need to be Chancellor is bags of confidence, an elite public school education, a completely irrelevant degree and a great deal of family wealth. Then, like George Osborne you can waltz into the job, impose your ideology and simplistic economic beliefs on the country, ruin its public services, destroy a significant number of people's lives and create poverty and hopelessness to a degree that hasn't been resolved a decade later...
Having badly damaged the economy and the nation's wellbeing you can waltz out of the job into several very highly paid positions (IIRC he had 4 or 5 highly paid jobs running concurrently at one stage) and become one of the 'great and good' at the head of a national cultural institution.
What's not to like?
Trouble with Rachel is that she doesn't have the essential wealth and public school education behind her...