Casdon
fancythat
Casdon
fancythat
10% who might revolt, is a huge number.
But it’s okay in your book for the children who aren’t vaccinated to put other children who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons, and young babies of other families at risk of serious illness or death because they aren’t yet fully vaccinated? That is the alternative.
I am not a poster child for anti vac.
As you see upthread i vaccinated my own.
People shoud be allowed to make their own personal choices.
I know, and I’m not saying you are anti vac yourself, I’m asking you if you think that in order to preserve the ability of some to choose, the children of others should be put at risk? The more children who aren’t vaccinated, the more children of others are put at risk, that is the dilemma.
See my last sentence.
Not meaning anyone in particular, but I am seriously thinking to change my name to something like my choice only two replies
Not being rude, but I do not have time, nor inclination come to that, to delve deep into anything. With the possible exception of God stuff.
I ought to be flattered I suppose, that so many people want to ask me so much.