I'm just wondering if she didn't fully understand her brief, mistakenly believing that part of her ministerial duty was to try and make people homeless, rather than prevent it in the wake of her own tenant eviction claims. Well she has resigned, just as well as the optics of evicting tenants, and then after a short period hiking the rent by £700 a month, kind of compromises the whole ethos of trying to prevent homelessness I would have thought
Then of course there's her parliamentary colleague who had the mould infested flats, but "terribly sorry he didn't know that" he's a landlord it's his business to know what state his properties are in whether he lets an agent handle all that or not.
Where do they find these people
I thought the last lot were a shower of sh***e, but Labour they're doing their best to catch them up, some would say they've even overtaken them given the so called counter productive measures from the "going for growth" that Rachel Reeves's budget implemented at the outset. What's the black hole now £40 billion, 50 billion???
Has anyone in the Cabinet ever run a business ???
As for the one in one out, I've heard the gang masters have wind of that and have advised in the unlikely event that prospective migrants will be returned to France they're kindly introducing their very own BOGOF, we'll whizz you over to the land of plenty, before you can utter "One way to the White Cliffs of Dover Please"