NO it s not just intolerance of his views it’s intolerance of his incitement to hatred of certain people, immigrants, blacks, women.. that were spewing out hatred for our children to hear and learn from. He had vile views and he was an influencer of the next generation
I had not heard of Charlie Kirk until his murder was reported; he was then described as a man who was taking unpopular ideologies into Universities for students to listen, discuss and debate why they were being perpetrated, not to influence students to follow them. That to me seems true freedom of speech, not banning people, Kathleen Stock for example, because a very strong group do not approve of her viewpoint and wish to silence her.
The emotive language used above, incitement of and spewing out hatred, vile views, does not encourage tolerance in any form.