Charlie Kirk shot

Friedgreentomatoes

Clearly, it is a mentality problem, not a gun problem, like Casdon also illustrates

And no, it is not less people. It is entitlement.

Is this the one Sago?

x.com/zzGodSpeed/status/1966121573146145150

Canada = 41 million people
USA = 340 million people

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Casdon

How do Canadians manage though if your argument stacks up FriedGreenTomatoes2? They have strict gun ownership laws, people live more remotely than they do in the USA, but they don’t have anything like the same issues?

Less people??

How does that make a difference if you are living in a rural backwater hundreds of miles from anybody else?

Sago, I am not sure if this is what she was talking about, but this video shows him saying exactly that. From his own mouth.

www.threads.com/@new.yorker/post/DOb6hvAkhYS/video-charlie-kirkblack-women-do-not-have-brain-processing-power-to-be-taken-seriously

Let me see if I can find a better link.

Casdon

How do Canadians manage though if your argument stacks up FriedGreenTomatoes2? They have strict gun ownership laws, people live more remotely than they do in the USA, but they don’t have anything like the same issues?

Less people??

Charlie Kirk’s killer was “not an amateur”, a former FBI officer has claimed.

“When you take a look at the venue, the distance, the stress, the concealment, the environmental factors, I would believe that this is not an amateur who just decided to find a rooftop on just any given day and got lucky,” Stuart Kaplan told The Telegraph.

“He was extremely disciplined in staying on point and completing the task,” Mr Kaplan added. “He would have had ample time to reload and shoot innocent bystanders. He chose not to, which tells me that this was a direct, deliberate, targeted attack to send or signal a message, and he took out Charlie Kirk.

“Maintaining your concealment and eluding and evading the detection of the law enforcement and being able to blend in and escape says that this person knew the venue. It was well prepared and well planned.”

How do Canadians manage though if your argument stacks up FriedGreenTomatoes2? They have strict gun ownership laws, people live more remotely than they do in the USA, but they don’t have anything like the same issues?

FGT2 I agree with the rural area dwellers feeling the need to protect themselves.

Chocolatelovinggran

Sadly, Mt61, some of this gentleman's posts seem racist to me.
He posted that black women were inferior intellectually to white women, and " stole" white women's jobs .

Can you give evidence of this please?

WRT the right to bear arms. I confess to being torn because America is VAST. Imagine living in some rural remote area and a bad guy turns up on your property. Swings open the gate and comes right over. What you gonna do? Ring the Police?? What, a hundred miles away if you’re in the outback? Good luck with that one. No wonder a shotgun and ‘come no further, get off my land’ is the preferred choice. That’d be mine anyway. Self (and family) preservation would be paramount.

Not in cities, granted. But in my example?
Definitely.

In case anyone is interested, this is the shooter at the High School in Colorado. He was 16 and reportedly radicalized online, though they have not released by who. We also have no other information yet on his other victims, race, gender, etc so who knows what his motive was.

Here is the one for Utah Valley campus.

www.change.org/p/prevent-charlie-kirk-from-speaking-at-utah-valley-university

952 signatures.

I will also point out that Utah is a VERY Republican conservative state.

I’m just mindful that for all the speculation, there never was a clear motive established for Lee Harvey Oswald. There’s so much speculation, so much attribution, but very few facts so far. The chances are that whoever did it, we we will never fully understand - I hope we do, but if he kills himself or is caught and killed it will be difficult to get into his mind.

Thanks iamaroud

It was phrased very respectfully and logically

I just noticed your post Norah. You are correct, that petition is for a completely different campus.

Here is one that encompasses all Utah campuses, but it has just over 300 signatures.

www.change.org/p/stop-charlie-kirk-from-spreading-hate-on-utah-campuses

Here is the petition. It explains very well why they created it. Charlie Kirk went to college campuses to spread his hateful opinions and there is probably a petition for every campus he spent time at.

www.change.org/p/prevent-charlie-kirk-from-speaking-at-utah-state-university

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Apparently a petition garnered nearly 7,000 signatures calling on the faculty at Utah State to bar Charlie Kirk from coming to the Logan campus, where the event was taking place.

“Utah State University has consistently worked toward fostering an inclusive space for all its students and faculty. Letting a figurehead, whose speeches often seem to undermine the essence of inclusivity, use our beloved institution as a platform contradicts this mission,” the petition states.

Well once again - what price debate? It’s just ‘my way or the highway’ according to Utah State University.

Respectfully, I'm not sure you are correct.

Shooting occurred at Utah Valley University. If your quote is correct (I can't find that quote), it really matters not what happens at Utah State University 2 hours away - or maybe I misunderstand?

Photo of the suspected shooter. It is reportedly an American Eagle shirt. They have been embroiled in their own racist drama lately, though I didn't care enough to follow it.

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Apparently a petition garnered nearly 7,000 signatures calling on the faculty at Utah State to bar Charlie Kirk from coming to the Logan campus, where the event was taking place.

“Utah State University has consistently worked toward fostering an inclusive space for all its students and faculty. Letting a figurehead, whose speeches often seem to undermine the essence of inclusivity, use our beloved institution as a platform contradicts this mission,” the petition states.

Well once again - what price debate? It’s just ‘my way or the highway’ according to Utah State University.

Students might have felt strongly that he was a divisive figure, promoting regressive, misogynist, extremist views and thought hi presence would be unwelcome in such an institution where freedom of speech is valued but the University obviously felt that he should be allowed to express his views, despite the protests by students.

It was a Change.org petition by students and received 942 supporters.

At the root of this murder is America’s obsession with the right to bare arms. It’s crazy in my opinion and is likely to become more entrenched. Any society that sees arming teachers as the way to reduce school shootings is sick

Then we live in increasingly polarised societies. The internet is awash with conspiracy theories and extreme views

Who needs genuine experts when we have JFK in spouting nonsense about vaccinations

It’s hard not to look at Trump and think ok Donald, your work here is done. Your country is falling apart

Magenta8

Allira

growstuff

Galaxy

I currently find the 'moderate' people completely frightening. I would no more want to be educated by them than fly to the moon.

I don't know what you mean. Maybe you could explain.

I would never allow any of my children to be educated by anybody inspired by Charlie Kirk and Turning Point. If I were American I'd home-school or move state rather than allow that to happen.

I don't understand either.

What is wrong with moderate please?

I understood it to mean not extreme.

My definition of politically moderate is a distrust and dislike of extreme politics of the left or the right.

What is yours growstuff?

My definition is about the same as yours - a dislike of extremism.

That's why I wouldn't want any child of mine to be educated in an environment influenced by Charlie Kirk and Turning Point, which advocates an extreme ideology.

Explaining why it isn't too bad that he was killed not explaining who did it.
Although it looks like things are developing fairly quickly on that front.

Galaxy

The 'moderate' people are currently celebrating or at the very least 'explaining' why Kirk died.
If you are so sure the moderate views are right then you should be happy for anyone to hear opposing views.

I want somebody to explain to me how anybody is explaining anything before it is known who killed him and why. Social media has a lot to answer for.

Allira

growstuff

Galaxy

I currently find the 'moderate' people completely frightening. I would no more want to be educated by them than fly to the moon.

I don't know what you mean. Maybe you could explain.

I would never allow any of my children to be educated by anybody inspired by Charlie Kirk and Turning Point. If I were American I'd home-school or move state rather than allow that to happen.

I don't understand either.

What is wrong with moderate please?

I understood it to mean not extreme.

My definition of politically moderate is a distrust and dislike of extreme politics of the left or the right.

What is yours growstuff?