Galaxy
Not reform doodledog.
Many of the things I associate with the far right are control of speech, arresting people for speech, flying a swastika, harassment of Jewish people etc and they are being carried out by the other 'side'. So it is quite complex.
I absolutely agree that the far right are out there which is why people using it for anyone they disagree with is so dangerous.
The swastika was a symbol, a flag to show allegiance to an ideology. What was on it is neither here nor there - it's a signifier. It could just as easily have been a kitten or a St George cross if those symbols had been recognised as signs of allegiance to the party.
Is beating people up different from arresting them? Both are deterrents from speaking freely or openly opposing, and arrests can only be ordered by those in power, so not doing so when not in power doesn't mean much, really. Obviously those tactics are not exclusive to the far right - IMO there is not much to choose between extremists when it comes to tactics.
I don't see people using the term 'far right' against 'anyone they disagree with'. I see people using it against those with a clearly racist agenda (bear with me) who use violence and intimidation to further their anti-immigration, homophobic and misogynist agenda, and piggyback on genuine concerns to do so.
That does not mean that everyone on protest marches has that agenda, or that they are racist or 'far right'. It means that IMO those behind the recent unrest are using other concerns to galvanise support for an agenda that is not usually stated by those at the head. They leave that to those who can be written off as aberrant thugs. But in power it would include media control (which now comprises online platforms), slashing of taxes and government spending, leaving the population to fend for themselves, anti-immigrant legislation and behaviour, reverence for 'British culture' (or the parts of that that suit their purpose), all of which do fit a far right viewpoint, particularly if they are enforced through fear and violence, such as we are currently witnessing.
I also think that there is not a lot of clear blue sky between telling people who are trying to debate this subject that we are basically too dim to see what is really going on and telling Brexiteers or Yaxley-Lennon supporters that they are stupid. I completely agree that a lot of this has come about because of a refusal to listen to people, and have been saying this for years too. I have also been saying for years that pushing people into groups (Boomers, 'snowflakes' 'the wealthy', 'benefit scroungers', etc) is sinister and intended to make us all easier to control. That is another far right tactic.
There is a huge difference between being a fascist or Nazi on one hand and wanting Britishness to mean something more than just having a passport or visa on the other - of course there is - and there is nothing remotely shameful about wanting to maintain traditional British values. But those values are tolerance, fairness and decency, not hatred, violence and disorder.