GrannyGravy13
Blimey, the thread title is a self fulfilling prophecy…
This is GransNet
🤕😵💫🤡
On this thread in particular, there are those who want to be almost aggressive to those that don't hold their views. It's a discussion thread, people have differing views.
GrannyGravy13
Blimey, the thread title is a self fulfilling prophecy…
This is GransNet
🤕😵💫🤡
Doodledog
Allira
All the same, I felt the need to speak out earlier, but I don't want to collude in making a bad situation worse, so I will leave it there.
You created the situation and now wish to retreat.
Other posters may comment if they wish.
I shan't be reporting any of your posts but they are personal attacks and not in the spirit of Gransnet.
I'm actually very surprised at you.Of course other posters can comment - it was very obvious who would do so. I don't 'wish to retreat', and I did not start it. The comment about being silenced and having a yellow card started it. That comment has been made several times before.
I could have stayed silent and let the dig pass, but I decided that I also have a right to express an opinion. Maybe you disagree, but it's ok - I won't report your posts which I see as personal attacks not in the spirit of GN.
Of course you have a right to express an opinion.
Unfortunately , as I see it, not only Grans but also the admin disallow certain opinions. Those opinions may be deemed racist or whatever.
Donald Trump himself should be welcome to write his opinions on Gnet . And Grans should be encouraged to be as aggressive as they like towards Trump's opinions.
Blimey, the thread title is a self fulfilling prophecy…
Allira
^All the same, I felt the need to speak out earlier, but I don't want to collude in making a bad situation worse, so I will leave it there.^
You created the situation and now wish to retreat.
Other posters may comment if they wish.
I shan't be reporting any of your posts but they are personal attacks and not in the spirit of Gransnet.
I'm actually very surprised at you.
Of course other posters can comment - it was very obvious who would do so. I don't 'wish to retreat', and I did not start it. The comment about being silenced and having a yellow card started it. That comment has been made several times before.
I could have stayed silent and let the dig pass, but I decided that I also have a right to express an opinion. Maybe you disagree, but it's ok - I won't report your posts which I see as personal attacks not in the spirit of GN.
Allsorts
On this thread in particular, there are those who want to be almost aggressive to those that don't hold their views. It's a discussion thread, people have differing views.
Be as disruptive as we like of repugnant views.
There is a difference between aggression towards a person and aggression towards their point of view.
You comment "people have different views"
And----?
All the same, I felt the need to speak out earlier, but I don't want to collude in making a bad situation worse, so I will leave it there.
You created the situation and now wish to retreat.
Other posters may comment if they wish.
I shan't be reporting any of your posts but they are personal attacks and not in the spirit of Gransnet.
I'm actually very surprised at you.
Doodledog
|I could say the same to you
. We all pick and choose what annoys us enough to reply to and what to skip past. You chose to reply to my post, just as I chose to reply to escaped's. What's the difference?
The difference is that the other posters are polite.Your comments on this thread are anything but.
And no, emojis don’t improve it.
Allira
The difference is that escaped's posts weren't personal attacks on other posters, they annoyed you because of their frivolity about what you perceived as a serious subject (although it wasn't really serious in the view of most posters).
Yours on this thread are personal attacks on another poster.
Therein lies the difference.
I prefer to be open about what (or whom) I am criticising, than to make oblique references that I know will be recognised by the person I am digging at, but can then be denied. Both are personal, but talking directly to one person is more honest, IMO.
And I was asking about the difference between you commenting on my post (rather than walking away as you suggest I should do), and my doing the same, not on the content of anyone's posts.
This is what happens when people express opinions that Some People don't like, though - it can result in cross-questioning and accusations by their friends. It is why a head of steam often builds up and posters come on to say it takes courage to post, and many don't understand what they mean (and others claim not to). Being upfront and saying 'this is what I am talking about' removes that rather unsettling atmosphere where nobody is very sure if they are being discussed or not, and people can hide behind 'I wasn't being personal'.
All the same, I felt the need to speak out earlier, but I don't want to collude in making a bad situation worse, so I will leave it there.
CariadAgain
Allira
CariadAgain
That's now raised my curiosity as to what went on in the "green trouser suit thread". Think it must have been before I started reading this forum.
Anyone got a link to it?
Guessing it was a serious discussion and somebody brought in a (totally irrelevant) green trouser suit and others started talking about trouser suits to derail the thread?Anyone got a link to it?
It's gone to the charity shop CariadAgain.
(Sorry, I'll get my knuckles rapped for a poor attempt at levity.)Ah right - I see.....and, for the record, I thought the suit looked awful too. Way too big trousers basically.
Shush CariadAgain!
You'll be in trouble.
ps I agree, it wasn't her best look, I have seen her look better.
The difference is that escaped's posts weren't personal attacks on other posters, they annoyed you because of their frivolity about what you perceived as a serious subject (although it wasn't really serious in the view of most posters).
Yours on this thread are personal attacks on another poster.
Therein lies the difference.
Allira
CariadAgain
That's now raised my curiosity as to what went on in the "green trouser suit thread". Think it must have been before I started reading this forum.
Anyone got a link to it?
Guessing it was a serious discussion and somebody brought in a (totally irrelevant) green trouser suit and others started talking about trouser suits to derail the thread?Anyone got a link to it?
It's gone to the charity shop CariadAgain.
(Sorry, I'll get my knuckles rapped for a poor attempt at levity.)
Ah right - I see.....and, for the record, I thought the suit looked awful too. Way too big trousers basically.
|I could say the same to you
. We all pick and choose what annoys us enough to reply to and what to skip past. You chose to reply to my post, just as I chose to reply to escaped's. What's the difference?
Doodledog
Allira
Doodledog I think your post to escaped is totally uncalled for. However, I hope it doesn't get reported, it should stay.
It's unlike you to make such nasty personal remarks. Nor does it become acceptable by adding a.
And as for escaped, she is always reasonable and I have never known her be unkind to others.
I'll await the accusations of clique but it is not. It's asking why?Why is because I am sick of hearing about how hard done by escaped feels over that thread. It is not usually mentioned specifically, but the digs and comments about how she was 'told off' and get a yellow card for simply not being intellectually appropriate or whatever are passive aggressive and tiresome. Ion my opinion, to which I am as entitled as she is to make her point, and you are to call me out about expressing it.
Seriously, it comes up time and time again. I fully understand that escaped feels aggrieved about being suspended, and maybe she has a point (I don't know who reported her or over which post), but the constant rehashing of it under the radar is (again IMO) as uncalled for as (in your opinion) was my post.
Can you not just skip past posts or threads which annoy you?
I do see that advice quite often on GN.
CariadAgain
That's now raised my curiosity as to what went on in the "green trouser suit thread". Think it must have been before I started reading this forum.
Anyone got a link to it?
Guessing it was a serious discussion and somebody brought in a (totally irrelevant) green trouser suit and others started talking about trouser suits to derail the thread?
Here it is. I’ve been on Gransnet for nearly 10 years, this is the thread that sticks with me.
www.gransnet.com/forums/chat/1338034-Angela-Rayner-ghastly-trouser-suit
Allira
Doodledog I think your post to escaped is totally uncalled for. However, I hope it doesn't get reported, it should stay.
It's unlike you to make such nasty personal remarks. Nor does it become acceptable by adding a.
And as for escaped, she is always reasonable and I have never known her be unkind to others.
I'll await the accusations of clique but it is not. It's asking why?
Why is because I am sick of hearing about how hard done by escaped feels over that thread. It is not usually mentioned specifically, but the digs and comments about how she was 'told off' and get a yellow card for simply not being intellectually appropriate or whatever are passive aggressive and tiresome. Ion my opinion, to which I am as entitled as she is to make her point, and you are to call me out about expressing it.
Seriously, it comes up time and time again. I fully understand that escaped feels aggrieved about being suspended, and maybe she has a point (I don't know who reported her or over which post), but the constant rehashing of it under the radar is (again IMO) as uncalled for as (in your opinion) was my post.
CariadAgain
That's now raised my curiosity as to what went on in the "green trouser suit thread". Think it must have been before I started reading this forum.
Anyone got a link to it?
Guessing it was a serious discussion and somebody brought in a (totally irrelevant) green trouser suit and others started talking about trouser suits to derail the thread?
Anyone got a link to it?
It's gone to the charity shop CariadAgain.
(Sorry, I'll get my knuckles rapped for a poor attempt at levity.)
Doodledog I think your post to escaped is totally uncalled for. However, I hope it doesn't get reported, it should stay.
It's unlike you to make such nasty personal remarks. Nor does it become acceptable by adding a
.
And as for escaped, she is always reasonable and I have never known her be unkind to others.
I'll await the accusations of clique but it is not. It's asking why?
CariadAgain
That's now raised my curiosity as to what went on in the "green trouser suit thread". Think it must have been before I started reading this forum.
Anyone got a link to it?
Guessing it was a serious discussion and somebody brought in a (totally irrelevant) green trouser suit and others started talking about trouser suits to derail the thread?
Wrong!😁
GrannyGravy13
Oh dear, sometimes a jovial(ish) post on a serious thread can diffuse a brewing pile on or another difficult situation.
I am guilty of the above, I am not in a clique 😼
Me too! 
Cossy
AGAA4
Colin from accounts was very cute. His acting was excellent.
I loved this show, it made me laugh out loud. I don’t find “Rachel from Accounts” in the least bit sexist, we have to hold onto our SoH in these dark times.
Especially as Colin was a male 😂
Loved Colin, he was very endearing.
AGAA4
Colin from accounts was very cute. His acting was excellent.
I loved this show, it made me laugh out loud. I don’t find “Rachel from Accounts” in the least bit sexist, we have to hold onto our SoH in these dark times.
I did wonder at the time Doodledog if you were related to Angela Rayner.
Apart from a couple of early posts about Rayner’s character, which was very wrong, the rest were purely on the style of the trouser suit.
Late in the thread some posters including me ( as the thread had become boring, there’s only so much you can say about style) were amused by comments from others.
It annoyed you for some reason.
Doodledog why feel the need to be so rude to escaped who has never written anything remotely so to another poster?
I really think the green trouser suit thread has left you seething for a very long time for no good reason at all.Everyone could and did have their say on that thread, regardless of any amusing posts on it, so your grudge seems very strange.
There are no cliques btw.
As the song goes…..Let It Go.
It's all in the open.
www.gransnet.com/forums/chat/1338034-Angela-Rayner-ghastly-trouser-suit?pg=6
Wow! Doodledog. Really?
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.