growstuff
Allsorts I get what you're saying, but I don't think it's quite that simple. I have a feeling that Maggie Oliver is behind some of it and I know she's seen a saint by some, but I don't trust her to be impartial (sorry, just a gut feeling but I don't say it lightly).
The girls have been listened to. If you delve a bit deeper and find the letters they've written, there is proof they were listened to. Some of them didn't like the directions which seem to have been taken. They've been told that they have misunderstood some things which were said to them (and, as far as I can tell, I think they have got a couple of things wrong), but that's not the same as lying. Targeting Jess Phillips is interesting, given her background.
I really do think they're being manipulated by people who want to use the whole issue as a political football - as something else to beat Labour for. Maybe there is persona gain involved or maybe the people who stand to lose are engineering a cover up. If you think about who stands to lose, it's the abusers and the authorities responsible for not following up and/or cover ups - some of the individuals involved are still working.
I think this story is going to run and run before any inquiry gets started ... and I think there are going to be some high profile casualties.
PS. I just realised I'm turning into a conspiracy theorist - think I'd better go and have another coffee!
Thanks for this growstuff, I was out last night, so catching up.
My understanding is the majority of survivors remain involved and express trust in Jess Phillips. This inquiry is complex and itās inevitable it will raise all kinds of emotions in survivors. I heard two of those who have left interviewed, they were articulate and clear in expressing views and feelings.
I know Louise Casey advised against a Judge led inquiry, to avoid delay. Jim Gamble (? Retired police) is impressive and imo seemed a good choice. I dint know enough about the other lead with a social work background but Iāve no reason to conclude her work history, like that if the police chief, would have been anything other than an asset. I could name retired Judges who imo would bring real expertise to the role. I canāt see any advantage in bringing in a chair who has no expertise in safeguarding
Iām fed up with this being a political football. We need all political parties to work cooperatively,