Gransnet forums

News & politics

Testing on animals...

(13 Posts)
TwiceAsNice Wed 12-Nov-25 15:25:19

I hope this happens quickly . Don’t forget in testing , whether paid or not, humans have an informed choice, animals do not.

Maremia Wed 12-Nov-25 14:46:14

At one time 'cloned' tissue was mentioned.

Maremia Wed 12-Nov-25 14:45:34

Yes, a friend who had cancer did this for a while.

Chocolatelovinggran Wed 12-Nov-25 11:32:15

This seems a very good idea. Hopefully modern science may be able to test drugs in laboratories on tissue samples and use computer modelling when needed.

Mollygo Wed 12-Nov-25 11:17:14

It’s a great idea, but many of us mightn’t be well or even be here if it wasn’t for the testing.
Let’s see if this thread will celebrate the future and not turn it into another campaign complaining about the past.

Lathyrus3 Wed 12-Nov-25 10:47:53

Well, some humans get paid. But some do actually just take any possible risks in order to further treatment of their condition and hopefully gain some benefit for themselves.

That’s what happens with a lot of medical trials.

Maremia Wed 12-Nov-25 10:41:38

Before they approve meds for humans, the products are tested on real people.
Difference is the humans get paid.

Lathyrus3 Wed 12-Nov-25 10:31:06

I’m at bit off beam here but it is a genuine question.

Will medicines and products for animals still be allowed to be tested on the relevant animals?

Or will the ban apply to those products too?

ExDancer Wed 12-Nov-25 10:22:12

I'm very much on the fence here as I am with lots of things, and I'm ashamed. I wonder how many products would disappear from out shelves and hospitals if animal testing had never been allowed.
Most cosmetics and cleaning products for starters, not forgetting most medicines .............

GrannyGravy13 Wed 12-Nov-25 10:12:08

Science has moved on and testing in animals is no longer the only way to trial new drugs, cosmetics even soap or toothpaste.

Let’s not forget how many lives have been saved over the years because of these experiments.

I will be pleased if this comes onto the statute books.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 12-Nov-25 09:37:30

What excellent news.

I remember my daughter, when she first worked for Glaxo was asked pre-employment if she minded working with animals - her reply an emphatic yes, so they never expected her to work with any animal.

In fact she used to house rabbits who had done their stint. They were always huge, and I must say in beautiful condition - never knew what was tested on them.

We were talking at the weekend about the way farm animals are treated and the way they were killed. Then went on to what a pigs ear humans have made of the planet, the way they treat other humans etc.

We decided that we were probably the worst pariah species on the planet.

NotSpaghetti Tue 11-Nov-25 23:48:57

I heard about this on the radio this morning.
I expect more info will be out soon.

MayBee70 Tue 11-Nov-25 23:13:32

'This Labour government is investing £75 million to phase out animal testing faster ❌
With cutting-edge alternatives like 3D bioprinted tissues and devices that mimic human organ functions, we're backing researchers to deliver solutions that protect animal welfare. ❤️
Our ambitious roadmap includes clear commitments:
👁️ By 2026: End testing on animals for skin and eye irritation investigations
🐟 By 2028: Reduce or replace the use of fish in acute toxicity testing of medicines, pesticides, and agrochemicals
💊 By 2030: Substantially reduce the use of dogs and non-human primates for investigating drug exposures or effects on heart rhythm'.
Posted by my MP tonight..