Oreo: "I may be the only poster saying that for police officers and prison officers the threat of violence comes with the nature of the job, what’s so hard to understand about that?"
You are entitled to your view. Nothing hard at all either in understanding your view as you set out. You have recognised that you are an outlier holding your view. Other posters set out their view that prison officers should not be expected to accept violence as an inherent or acceptable part of their job. While prison work involves inherent risks due to the nature of the population, official policy and safety advocates emphasise that being assaulted or abused is not a routine part of the job.
Here is a breakdown of the current perspectives and policies:
Official Position (HMPPS): Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) states that violence, including assaults and abuse, is "not part of the job".
Zero Tolerance Policies: The Prison Officers Association (POA) and official policies advocate for a "Zero Tolerance" approach to violence against staff, aiming to treat assaults as crimes that should be referred to the police for investigation.
Occupational Hazard vs. Acceptable Behaviour: Although violence is a frequently encountered risk in a prison environment, framing it as an "occupational hazard" that officers must tolerate is rejected by staff unions, who argue that workers deserve the same legal protections as police and the general public.
Safety Measures: In response to rising assaults on staff (which reached over 120 per 1,000 prisoners in 2025), authorities have implemented measures like PAVA incapacitant spray, body-worn cameras, and rigid, enhanced training to help officers manage and de-escalate violence.
Duty of Care: The prison service has a legal duty of care to protect staff from foreseeable injury and to ensure their safety and wellbeing.
While acknowledging the reality of a dangerous environment, the consensus is that the system should aim to prevent and penalise violence rather than treating it as acceptable.