Cardamom
But these 2 grifters aren't the royal family absent. We don't pay anything for them. They left; don't you remember?
People don't remember and many fail to understand the function of the Monarch and how a Constitutional Monsrchy works.
Some members of a family whose brother, father uncle, sister, mother etc just happens to be the Monarch should be irrelevant as long as the Monarch does the job required of them. Their power is limited, unlike a President.
(Please don't bring up Ireland as a good example anyone. That is irrelevant too! 😀)
What does need to happen is that we should retain a Constitutional Monarch but make it easier to remove unsuitable or irrelevant members of the family from the line of succession.
Harry and Meghan are not supported by the British taxpayer, that's why they go have to earn a living and they are trading on their names and connections to do so, having rejected those connections. However, they are not representing the Royal family, they are celebs.