Or could it make you question the party?
I’ve always had a lot of sympathy for the Greens, but Zack Polanski has more than once”embellished” his background
The Green Party leader said on his official campaign website in 2020 that he was “currently working at the Ministry of Justice on their training & diversity programmes
However the MoJ has no record of Mr Polanski ever working for the department. When asked about the claim, a spokesman for Mr Polanski said he had worked for the “justice assessment committee”, which he described as “a programme to improve the diversity of justice appointments based in the MoJ”
Aye, right
When challenged over the discrepancies, the Green Party leader eventually admitted that, rather than working at the Ministry of Justice, he had been hired through an agency that supplied actors for role-play scenarios to a quango responsible for interviewing would-be judges. As part of the recruitment process, judicial candidates take part in mock courtroom exercises in which actors play criminals, prison guards and lawyers
Does that qualify Hugh Grant to be Prime Minister? (Love Actually)
Then there was his British Red Cross claim
On the eve of the local elections, Mr Polanski admitted that, despite repeatedly claiming otherwise while campaigning for elected office, he had never in fact been a “spokesperson” for the British Red Cross.
Not to mention all that obscurity over Rachel Reeves background as an Economist at the Bank of England when BBC2 revealed
Rachel Reeves's banking background has faced scrutiny following claims of exaggerated CV details and an alleged investigation into her expenses at HBOS (2006–2009). Investigations suggest she worked as a retail banking manager rather than an economist during that time
Are they taking us for mugs?
I remember a candidate for a teaching post many years ago. When we found that his CV did not stack up, he was politely shown the door.
But not our political leaders it seems.
He is the leader of the green party and it is perfectly reasonable to ask questions about his record, his integrity, etc. If we had been more careful about asking those questions about Mandelsson for example, who knows we may not be on the brink of a leadership challenge in the labour party.
How very disappointing, for some, that Angela Raynor has been cleared by HMRC of deliberate wrongdoing or carelessness over her tax affairs.
MaizieD
If you have read the preceding posts, MOnica you’ll find some equally questionable CVs offered by politicians of various parties, many who achieved responsible posts in government.
Why is one particular politician being singled out?
It's a spectrum of "optimising" your experience so it looks more impressive than it is. It can be from exaggerating occasional duties to make it sound as if they were a normal responsibility, within an honestly stated job title (which is pretty universal), up to falsly claiming a medical or similar degree based on a certificate purchased from an overseas provider (which is gross).
So I think a blanket "their CV wasn't accurate" isn't v helpful. Tbh, Rachel Reeves' inaccuracy over her job title was pretty blatant but Zac & his "working at the Ministry of Justice" is even more of a whopper. The daft thing is, in politics they don't need to do it. If you're electable, public "gets" you, then your job history isn't make or break like it would be in a corporate appointment.
I wish Caroline Lucas was still in charge but I can see Zac might appeal to the younger target-Green voters better.
So
Disappointing for Starmer certainly Maremia 
I didn't say you shouldn't ask question about integrity of leaders Galaxy but that this isn't, as you suggested, the Green Party being subjected to scrutiny. It is just more Americanisation of our politics. More "playing the man not the ball."
Our democracy is very different to theirs and personally I would rather have ours than theirs. I do not want a country with no NHS, no statuary holidays, no maternity leave and little or no help when people are in need.
Galaxy
Disappointing for Starmer certainly Maremia
I don't see him as such a bitter character: I wonder why you do.
When the Conservatives left they did not leave a lovely smell of roses. However, I would much rather have a faint smell of roses than the stench of manure now permeating the air from Labour!
love0c
When the Conservatives left they did not leave a lovely smell of roses. However, I would much rather have a faint smell of roses than the stench of manure now permeating the air from Labour!
That too is not about politics but populism love0c. You sound like a Conservative voter who doesn't want to discuss real political policies but would rather attack people or groups of people. You are, of course, entitled to do that, but it is not discussing politics.
Sorry if people aren't talking in the way you would like them to DAR, I know that can be very difficult for some people.
I happen to think there are certain values that are important in leaders, integrity, bravery, critical thinking, etc.
I am not sure why discussing those is linked to an americanisation of politics, and let's face it there would be many worse places to be, Afghanistan, Iran, etc.
It’s a distraction to talk of the US and how different their politics is.
Do you admire Polanski DaisyannReturns ? Even if you do, many others do not.
I think you may have missed the point I was making, Oreo. I’ve been saying that personal attacks on politicians, without discussing any actual policy, stop being meaningful political debate.
What I do like is Zack Polanski's "Bold Politics". The latest edition is an interview with the New Economic Forum’s CEO, Danny Sriskandarajah.
Polanski gives his interviewees plenty of time to extrapolate on the point they are making. That gives listeners time to form a rounded opinion. It is very far from the gossip and name calling so often offered as political argument.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LhsxyjO5Mg
DAR And there she goes again!
What I find more discouraging is the five millions worth of manure, that Farage was trying to hide.
The stench of his corruption is difficult to miss.
love0c
DAR And there she goes again!
Do you think not learning from others is a good thing?
Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.
love0c
DAR And there she goes again!
This also seems to be nothing to do with the subject and everything to do with attacking me.
Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.
Polanski may not yet be a s big a blagger as Farage, but Farage is older and had more time to develop his skills and contacts . Give Polanski enough time and I am sure he will eventually be as confident and successful as Farage, and as untrustworthy.
Do you think M0nica? The jury is out for me on whether Polanski is a long term prospect for the Greens, or whether he will fade back into obscurity, possibly even of his own volition.
The public rightly expects political leaders have integrity, be honest and transparent. Yet all politicians are human and some will lie or have lied in the past. Some of those lies will be much more significant than others. Some untruths will be current and some historical found out by investigative reporting. Some lies/untruths/embellishments will be inadvertent and some intentional. Those differences matter.
The press will always be on the hunt to uncover such things tof political leaders and their senior colleagues- its makes good copy and influences public opinion.
A political leader, or senior party member, lying on a CV, or lying on any other matter, makes me question that person- not the party in the first instance. I would consider the degree and extent of the lie/s, inadvertent or intentional and how far short have they fallen below the standards of integrity we should expect.
However, being human I do compare the numbers and extent of reported incidents across the parties. Is there one party worse than any of the others for example.
For example Reform has Farage (current £5million furore as just one example), Tice (alleged to have underpaid or avoided tax between (£100,000-600,000) and Zahawi (had to pay £5million to HMRC for unpaid tax PLUS an addition penalty, when chancellor of the exchequer and had to stand down- he also never made public what the penalty was for, or how much or the HMRC investigation outcome) Suella Braverman broke the ministerial code by using her own personal email address etc.
Those figures far exceed anything Ive seen ever reported for other parties. Eg Farage £5 million form Harbrone v Boris £1million from Harborne. Reform current leader's figures appear to far outweigh unpaid council tax, embellishment on a CV or Rayner's, seemingly inadvertent, £40k underpaid tax on a house sale contained within a complicated trust /second home purchase.
Being older, in politics for longer, having more contacts etc etc would lead me to expect that politician to be even more honest and transparent in their dealings, not less. They've been around the block more, have seen their peers "cop it in the press" also. Indeed they may have commented on those copping it, i.e. saying they deserve it and must go/people shouldn't trust that party. When they are found out the same rules apply.
Some do step down and go....depending on the extent of the lies - e.g Boris Johnson.
Casdon
Do you think M0nica? The jury is out for me on whether Polanski is a long term prospect for the Greens, or whether he will fade back into obscurity, possibly even of his own volition.
I always hope that people like Polanski get their come uppance as soon as possible, but look where being untrustworthy has got Farage and oris Johnson got to become Prime Minister despite well documented career as a liar.
I know, I don’t think Polanski is a career politician somehow though, he’s more of an activist than purely out to make money for himself. I can’t see him settling for the relative mundanity of politics.
In my opinion Polanski is a power junkie. He left the LibDems for the Greens because the LibDems wouldn't indulge his race to the top. I doubt he could recognise a scruple if it jumped up and hit him in the face. The sooner he fades back into obscurity the better.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.
