I work as an HLTA in primary schools (and am a book editor outside of these hours). Grammar, spelling etc is something that just glares at me if it's wrong.
The trouble is that because of large class sizes and mixed abilities (SEN) within them, education nowadays is more about crowd control than learning. Some of the brighter children have developed the ability to ignore 'behaviours', others who could do well if they applied themselves simply join in with the disruption. I sometimes go in wondering if it will be my turn to be on the receiving end of physical abuse from a child.
We are told that inclusion is a good thing. Well, having seen standards drop over the past several years (with a government response being to up the testing - which is firmly tied to school failure - because of the behaviours), I beg to differ. Why should a child who does not want to learn and trashes the classroom/goes on the rampage receive preferential treatment? Staff have to see the positives and ignore the negatives. So children are allowed to do whatever the hell they want with no reprisals.
My heart bleeds for the middle of the road learners who, years ago, would have received more attention. Nowadays, if a child can get a sentence down on paper, never mind the spellings, it's considered successful.
It may surprise you to know that ESL children, some of whom start at school aged 8 and above, generally concentrate well and want to learn. They often do better in tests having only been in the country for a couple of years, than native children do. Sad to say I am currently finalising a TEFL qualification so that I can teach English to these children. At least at the end of the working day I will know I have achieved something positive and not have to dodge thrown chairs/punches.
I truly despair of what will happen to this country when these children are of working age. Ads for jobs will read 'Be a bilder wiv us' or 'secatry wonted in are cumpny'...