Is anyone else getting fed up with pet insurance policies?
I took my dog, aged 9, to the vet's this year with an ear infection. I was paying something like £40 a month to pet insurers at the time so it seemed a good time to get something for insuring a very healthy dog.
But no. The insurers said that because he'd had an ear infection when he was about 2 years old it counted as a "pre-existing condition".
Call me ignorant but I would have thought that "pre-existing" meant a condition which the dog was suffering from at the time the policy was taken out - which was not so many years ago - rather than something that went wrong a long time ago and was cleared up. I totally understand that insurance premiums for a dog who is already suffering from a chronic condition should be higher than for a dog who is fit and well at the time of the policy commencement. But that's not what is happening here - the insurers are effectively saying that my boy gets one ear infection covered in his lifetime...and presumably if he stepped on a thorn and needed the vet to remove it, he'd have to use up his one sore paw allowance.
Imagine if this were true of car insurance. When my catalytic converter was stolen from under my hybrid car for the second time in 3 months - because the local gangs of thieves target certain cars and I hadn't had time to fit a catloc - LV paid up the second time with no arguments.
I have cancelled insurance policies for both my cat and my dog now. Instead I put a more than equivalent sum every month into premium bonds.
Army horses loose on London streets
Name, Place, Animal, Object 10
Have any of you got all electric cars? Pros and cons please.