In a culture where marriage is essentially about producing offspring and continuing the family line, and where girls were expected to start reproducing almost as soon as they were physically able to, arranged marriages do make 'sense' because the people in control are the older adults. The girls are still just that — girls, and probably not old enough, educated enough, or experienced enough to arrange their own lives. That is the crux: arranged marriages keep the older generation in control and give less scope for the younger generation to change old customs by going about it in a different way. In many ways, we've seen it all before in this country. Just think of Jane Austen's novels. It wasn't perhaps quite so prevalent, but the older generation control thing was still there.
I prefer the "power to all our friends" idea and so am not in favour of arranged marriages. For me the ideal is for young people to be allowed to grow up well-educated and able to make their own life decisions in their own time.
I think this discussion links well with the one about the proposed new marriage laws. The definition of marriage is changing in most people's eyes. It is no longer seen as being just about procreation. The power balance is changing too.
Next of Kin/Emergency Contact?
A Light Hearted Look at Nicknames
How should a family manage an estranged relationship?
'Lost generation’: why can’t young people get jobs? What should be done?
