It's not unusual to see threads where someone is advised to reduce or drop contact with a friend who clearly is not a real friend, by their behaviour.
Family are usually given more leeway than friends, but if a family member is creating arguments or ill-feeling, or expecting their wishes to always come first, it makes sense to avoid or cut contact with them.
I'm not saying the person who is cut out is always the one at fault, but they often can be.
Gransnet forums
Relationships
Mumsnet discussions about estrangement
(117 Posts)I've just looked at the posts and advice given out on mumsnet about going nc and generally about relationships with parents and am horrified at the content of the posts and comments to them. There is alot of toxic advice on there, no real support that I can see, only others adding to the dramas in their lives, fuelling discussions that achieve nothing more than pure hate. It's no wonder there are so many mums go nc at the slightest thing and don't see any other way to deal with issues in their lives. It's a scourge of our society getting this sort of 'help' in forums that thrive on hateful posts about their parents. This blame game is so damaging the fabric of families.
Advocating dropping friends or family if they no longer serve a purpose!!!!
Selfish narcissistic behaviour personified!
No wonder gp’s get a bad press - if parents don’t get something out of the so called relationship, move on, walk away, after all why waste your time on someone who won’t give in to your needs,?
Your the only one who matters right?
IMO, Mumsnet is no different to Gransnet with the number of posters advocating to drop friends/family if they no longer serve a purpose.
Peonyrose, surely you see that you passed judgement on what another described as ghosting or fading but readily accepted parenting methods that kept children at arms length because that's the way things were then- As if the methods used now don't count- Both keep children at bay-
Bradford Lass, I think a lot of parent were like yours. They did love and care very much for their children, but we're not able to physically show it as that's how they were bought up. It was just the times. We are all more outspoken and openly demonstrative now. People hug when they meet, kiss good bye. I never finished every conversation with Love You, but it's common place now.
What a reflection of our times, to say ghosting or no contact is an easy fading away. I can only assume that was said to provoke. Surely no one thinks that is acceptable behaviour.It says more about the poster. Not everyone can get on, but surely no child or parent should be just cast out. If after trying and talking with your family, you still find it beyond yourselves to be in the same room with them on your own, make arrangement that include other members of family. Families come in all shapes and sizes, there's room for all, be there for each other and stop thinking about your own feelings and petty grievances. Unless there is physical or emotional abuse surely there's no need to break away. I cannot imagine how much that must hurt. There is one lady on another forum, who has been cut off by her sisters in the same year her beloved daughter died. How can anyone deserve that. She's grieving already.
Norah has someone actually said to you, "you're not wanted"? That's awful and so very painful.
My sister and I grew up thinking we were not wanted, by either parent but actually, it wasn't quite like that at all.
Neither of my parents had the first idea how to understand children. They expected adult reasoning and reactions even when we were small.
They were efficient parents who did their best (I didn't think so at the time) but they had no idea at all how to be physically affectionate or talk and play with us on our own level.
My elder son has inherited these traits.
I would advise anyone who feels they are not wanted, to think carefully if this is really the case or is it just that their parents got it wrong and didn't know how to do it right?
In her elder years my mother desperately wished she'd been able to show affection more and bitterly regretted the consequences of not knowing how to do so.
I never went NC, choosing instead to try and understand how my out-of-their-depth parents struggled, so was in a position to find out (in my late 40's) what was really going on in her heart, before she died.
I never dreamed of threatening my parents with estrangement. The fact that so many young adults are contemplating this act is disturbing. I have seen quite a bit of estrangement encouragement on US forums similar to mums net.
For whatever reason this thread reminded of 50 Ways to Leave Your Lover by Paul Simon-
I thought ghosting was more like there one day, gone the next- Where as a slow fade took more time-
Some people rip band aids off in one fell swoop while others peel them away very slowly- Perhaps all that matters is that the wound beneath has healed- I'm sure it's possible to cause injury during removal-
This post did begin by delineating what some feel Mumsnet posters think of NC, some say ghosting, but its down to the same.
I actually said "Really, I dont want to be near anyone who doesnt want me, I think NC to be a good solution for all concerned. An easy fading away.
I stand by my words, I dont want to be with anyone who doesnt want me. I think it is called "to ghost" and it does sound to be an easy fading away (If you are not wanted).
To whoever said nc is an 'easy fading away' obviously feels nothing..it is actually like a death to those you estrange. It is hurt beyond words..
Silverlining48 I had to Google flying monkeys.. These terms are new to me.. and my head is spinning!! But it explains something that previously puzzled me. Thank you for highlighting this behaviour type. I too found MN full of advice on how to go no contact, but I have been challenged on this and although I was surprised I still thought, so be it.
I’m with you Iam64 - the person doing NC may be happy with fading away as it is their choice but how could anyone willingly give up a beloved child or grandchildren?
"I think NC to be a good solution for all concerned. An easy fading away"
Norah, if that's been your experience of NC, then you are unusual. I don't know anyone, nor have I seen people on the estrangement threads who have found no contact to be "an easy fading away". It's been painful, distressing, devastating and desperate for most people. Some of them/us reach an accommodation with their/our situation but an easy fading away - I don't think so.
Has anyone else wondered how often there are respective generations from the same family complaining bitterly about each other on MN and on here?
I guess no-one would recognise themselves as everyone on both sites claim to be completely blameless in the situation, compared to the other family member inevitably described as 'toxic.
I'm sure it must happen!
Smileless2012, I think that to be true, if NC is desired by anyone they will find a way. Really, I dont want to be near anyone who doesnt want me, I think NC to be a good solution for all concerned. An easy fading away.
Sounds mean for NC
sounds like a flimsy excuse IMO but then again, if you want to go NC sometimes any excuse will do.
Joyfulnanna,
Yes, I think that each person's perception of an event is different, because each person is indeed different with their own agenda. My sister friend row with her dil because my friend wanted her dil (not son, why I'll never know) to make decisions well before time to decide. That sounds mean for NC, but we havent walked in her shoes.
Smileless2012, I thought the gm to be the parent. Sorry if I missed someone in the long list of who opines on the matter. GGP, GP, daugher, son, dil, sil, aunt, uncle, cousin, friend, and others. OK?
I remember a while ago out of curiousity looking at MN and was astonished at the vitriolic response in relation to grandparents who were judged not to have done enough child care or not provided enough money etc etc.
One of these gave a link to a site with advice about how to go no contact. I took a look and found a number of these ‘advice’ sites using terms like toxic, narcissistic , flying monkeys (!) which I think meant cutting out the rest of the family too in case they passed on information. It was a real eye opener.
I agree Joyfulnanna. Why didn't you include parents in your list of those who "have a true side to their story" Norah?
Aha yes each person's perception of an event is different depending on their own agenda. It's the spirit of what happened that's important, and what is left out of the discussion causing misunderstanding. The embellishments people add can be misconstrued as truth. If all parties don't discuss the event together, then the 'spirit' can never be agreed. That's my take anyway. Sorry that was probably a bit boring
Joyfulnanna, As many as are in the story have their own side to the story. The son, the dil, the gm, the doughter, the sil, the gc, each have a true side to their story.
Three or four accounts of the same story? Please explain that?
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
