Hi, nightsky2. I thought that until a solicitor of my acquaintance disabused me. Anyone with a 'reasonable expectation' of inheritance can challenge a Will. And a couple of years back a ruling was given partially in favour of the daughter of a woman who had not included her offspring who was living a life similar to thomasina34's grown up child. While the daughter did not get all she wanted from the estate, she did get a share:
A landmark ruling which saw a daughter overturn her estranged mother's will could pave the way for others to do the same - even if is against their wishes:
............
"Melita Jackson wrote a letter explaining why she was not leaving a penny to Heather Ilott, who eloped when she was 17.
Instead she wished her net estate of around £486,000 to be split between The Blue Cross, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
But Mrs Ilott took her case to the Court of Appeal after her mother died in 2004 aged 70 and has now been awarded £163,000.
They added Mrs Jackson had "no connection" with the charities she stated her money should be left to during her lifetime.
Law experts have warned more wills could be challenged by surviving adult children following the ruling.
Gary Rycroft, a member of the Law Society's wills and equity committee, said: "This ruling is saying that while you can still disinherit your children, you are going to have to explain why and show connections with those you are leaving the money to."
.........
Grans, if you can't get on with your nearest and dearest, forge connections with well intentioned charities or spend it! .