Gransnet forums

Religion/spirituality

Who is God?

(462 Posts)
gramps Tue 28-Aug-12 16:49:17

Dear friends,
This is the article which I mentioned on the Spiritual page yesterday.
Please keep an open mind while reading it, and remember that we should always respect another persons beliefs, even if you don't agree with them!

We all have our own views on such a sensitive subject as "Religion"!

Who is God?

Well folks, this is my idea on God!
I hope it does not offend anyone, but it may give something to think on!
I think that God, as we are taught, is a Spirit, We have been led to believe in God as a person, whom we take after ; - This makes it easier to explain, as people in general cannot accept a more ethereal being that is not bound by time or space,.
God is the Spirit of life; it runs through all living things. Therefore we are part of God and the God Spirit is part of us!
(I trust that this does not sound like blasphemy to anybody. These are my own thoughts expressed here!)
Life is sacred, and we all have free will. We have a moral code, laid down by wise leaders over many thousands of years.
Ideally, we use our conscience to behave and live by that moral code.
I believe in a power, much stronger than we can imagine, whose strength we can call upon to strengthen and help us when we ask. This is always available to all, no matter whether you have a faith or not, Of course, as with all things, if you have faith, you are a more positive person which uses your stronger inner strength!
I call that powerful Spirit GOD!
Many religions recognise God in different ways, and I think that each of us has their own pathway to tread. We should not force our own thoughts upon other people.
I am proud to be a Christian, but I respect other points of view!
Jesus is widely recognised as a great Teacher in other religions and respected as such.
As for natural disasters, I have no answer. For crimes of war, brutality, injustice, etc. I bring in the argument of "Free Will" again!
, This does not address all of the points raised, i.e., sickness, but this again is a natural phenomena caused by environmental and other conditions, some of which are man made! - Free will again!
Nature has a way of protecting itself, which is not always in our best interests!!
Sorry if I've gone on a bit with my ramblings. It may provoke a bigger discussion!

Gramps
Feb 2010

Greatnan Wed 29-Aug-12 17:29:54

That is fine with me, Bags - I don't mind what people say about my beliefs or ideas, as long as they don't make thinly -veiled comments on my personality!

absentgrana Wed 29-Aug-12 17:29:35

AlisonMA This is notpersonal; it is all published on this thread.

"It is noticable [sic] that some GNs do a lot of talking about how brilliant/good/clever they are but this is not something Christians tend to do."
29/08/2012 10:50:47

"I assume everyone is nice and then my illusions are shattered – again. I stand up for those I feel have been wronged and get stuff thrown at me because I did. However, I look at myself in the mirror each morning and know I have clear conscience. Been going on all my life."
29/08/2012 14:26:01

Some GNs do a lot of talking about how brilliant/good/clever they are … Blowing your own trumpet. J'accuse.

JO4 Wed 29-Aug-12 17:28:10

And I still think that is a cop-out, especially for a minister!

JO4 Wed 29-Aug-12 17:26:59

Marelli I hope you don't think I used the word "special" in any unpleasant way! I am going mainly on a particular young woman who attends my daughter's church. She is so friendly and affectionate.

I do think a Downs syndrome person may need a bit more care than others. Is that patronising? It's certainly not meant to be.

AlisonMA Wed 29-Aug-12 17:26:52

I think it is reasonable to take offence if the comment is personal. I thought this was not allowed on GN. It might also be helpful if people read the actual post, not their interpretation of it.

Nanadogsbody Wed 29-Aug-12 17:25:25

But Greatnan it's the adherents that are often the problem. I wonder how many 'founders' of religions such as Jesus, Mohammed, Budha, etc would agree with the way their philosophies have been interpreted or even twisted?

Bags Wed 29-Aug-12 17:22:09

Would it not make things easier if we all accepted that we may well find the 'way' a thought or belief that is different from our own is expressed somewhat troubling? It's so easy to take offence where no offence is meant. Perhaps if we all bore in mind that offence is in nearly all cases (certainly on gransnet) not meant (only strong feelings, deeply held beliefs, powerful thoughts) things would chug along better.

To put it another way, shouldn't we just accept that people have a right to express views on things they feel strongly about in strong, but inoffensive language? In short, that it's OK to say this or that view is ridiculous if that's what you think. It doesn't, after all, make the view ridiculous if it isn't, so why take offence?

Greatnan Wed 29-Aug-12 17:17:57

Quite so, Marelli.

Marelli Wed 29-Aug-12 17:08:56

J04's comment about my minister neighbour's cop-out reply couldn't be further form the truth. What he meant was that it was down to the individual how they perceived what may happen to us all 'afterwards', and whether or not the way they lived may just not so much make a difference to that, but may make us feel more comfortable with ourselves by doing the best we can without harming anyone on the way.
I cannot ever come to terms with the attitude that because a person has Down's Syndrome or any other disability, that that person is 'special'. They are not special. They are people who do not need to feel patronised.

Greatnan Wed 29-Aug-12 17:00:57

Go on then, jingle, tell us which bit of expression you don't like.

JO4 Wed 29-Aug-12 16:59:54

It's the way it's expressed. hmm

Greatnan Wed 29-Aug-12 16:58:06

It need not happen, if people could accept that criticism of a religion is not criticism of its adherents.

Nanadogsbody Wed 29-Aug-12 16:46:02

Absolutely * Ariadne* - your post and mine crossed in hyperspace.

Nanadogsbody Wed 29-Aug-12 16:45:02

No problem with debate. But there's a difference between constructive and destructive.,

Ariadne Wed 29-Aug-12 16:44:22

But isn't there a difference between lively debate and people attacking one another? Which is what always happens when religion is the topic.

Greatnan Wed 29-Aug-12 16:41:00

No problem with the debates, Lily - I enjoy them and don't wish to interfere with anybody else's faith.

Lilygran Wed 29-Aug-12 16:38:56

Mamie,I'm sure you're right about us never agreeing on matters of religion and politics, but if we did we wouldn't have these lively debates.sunshine

vampirequeen Wed 29-Aug-12 15:19:27

Gramps....Vamps is fine. It's just one of my peculiarities (of which I have many) to not like Vampysmile

Nanadogsbody Wed 29-Aug-12 15:00:51

jings grin and [sigh]

Bags Wed 29-Aug-12 14:55:16

jings, grin and [sigh]

JO4 Wed 29-Aug-12 14:55:15

That's not the religions fault.

Nanadogsbody Wed 29-Aug-12 14:51:24

This is why I detest religions, they invariably cause argument and bitterness.

JO4 Wed 29-Aug-12 14:48:40

Maybe God worked through her lawyer or embassy.

Bags Wed 29-Aug-12 14:46:34

Do you know, proud atheist though I am, I think I could "find god" (does it matter which one? Would Athena do, for instance?) if it meant I got let off a death sentence. I don't suppose her release had anything to do with her lawyer or her country's embassy appealing on her behalf? No, that would be a cynical thought. [sarc emoticon]

absentgrana Wed 29-Aug-12 14:18:17

J'accuse AlisonMA!