Gransnet forums

Religion/spirituality

Prince William - future Defender of the Faith

(42 Posts)
Joan Tue 15-Jan-13 22:40:53

You're so right, Greatnan. Religious leaders often complain that some of their followers 'cherry pick' what to believe or not, but when you think about it, almost all believers do that.

Otherwise we'd still be doing stuff like stoning adulterers to death. Oh and catholic women would be dying in middle age from overworked uteri - or living in celibate misery.

As for Willie - he has no choice but to look like a believer. We can't expect him to actually live it though!

Greatnan Tue 15-Jan-13 10:36:53

Some people do seem able to square the circle when it comes to their religious practices. Cherie Blair is a devout Catholic, but she was reported to have taken part in some odd rituals with crystals, etc.
Perhaps William will take the oath with his fingers crossed. grin

JessM Tue 15-Jan-13 08:33:35

It is so difficult to tell really isn't it anno whether people are conforming or sincere. Also, who would think that C and C, aristocratic anglicans to the core, one would have thought, would be so keen on all the alternative hindu hippy stuff? grin

annodomini Tue 15-Jan-13 08:25:57

William made his marriage vows in church before a god, so presumably he would have no qualms about doing the same about a coronation. His father said he wanted to be 'defender of faith' (not THE faith) which caused some consternation at the time.

JessM Tue 15-Jan-13 07:26:44

Mind you, joan Will does not have to be elected!

Joan Tue 15-Jan-13 04:07:20

I think William is one of those people who would feel he has no right to reject religion, given his position in life.

We will never know if he is a believer, agnostic or atheist. He is simply not in a position to make waves. I would bet he never gives it much thought.

I would think the same is true of American politicians - whatever their state of belief or non belief, they'd better pretend to believe - or else!!

petallus Mon 14-Jan-13 18:50:26

I'm just making the observation that many people probably would give a fig Greatnan

Not saying I agree with them.

JessM Mon 14-Jan-13 18:22:59

Certainly time to disestablish and if the church of e keeps tying themselves in knots about women bishops and gay marriage it could yet happen. If the next PM happened to be an agnostic of Jewish ancestry maybe grin But not likely under the present queen.
Prince Charles seems to be a closet member of the dippy hippy new-age (not sewage you silly spell checker) brigade. So no knowing what he will do once his mama shuffles off. Replace holy communion with a Hindu aruvedic cleansing and rebirth experience perhaps. grin
I predict a showdown with Kate though. Bet she is not going to want to use homeopathy instead of conventional medicine for her baby. Bring on those vaccines Kate.
Or go through any yogic detox rituals to prepare for the birth. grin Or let Camilla to chant in the corner during her labour grin

Greatnan Mon 14-Jan-13 17:58:20

I believe that Henry VIII was given the title by the pope - how ironic!

Nonu Mon 14-Jan-13 17:52:45

I thought historically the King or Queen was defender of the faith ?

Greatnan Mon 14-Jan-13 17:34:55

Why should they, Petallus? Surely it is nobody's business but his own. He either believes or he doesn't - he can't be forced to believe just because he is in line for the throne. (I have no idea whether he does or not, of course.)
I suppose it would cause a constitutional crisis if he refused to take the oath in the coronation - hmm, interesting times ahead, perhaps!

Mishap Mon 14-Jan-13 16:41:39

Time to disestablish then William's belief or non-belief becomes no-one else's business but his own.

Lots of other reasons to disestablish of course.

petallus Mon 14-Jan-13 09:27:09

Loads of people do bags

Bags Mon 14-Jan-13 09:22:33

Yep. Disestablish. Then who gives a fig whether William goes to church or believes anything religious at all?

Ariadne Mon 14-Jan-13 09:03:39

So true! Disestablish!!!

Greatnan Mon 14-Jan-13 08:53:17

I think the church and state should be completely separate, then the Royal Family would have the same rights as everybody else, to accept or reject religion according to their conscience.

vampirequeen Mon 14-Jan-13 06:23:22

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261908/Prince-William-church-handful-times-year.html

So he doesn't go very often. Does it matter? Would it be better if he was a hypocrite and pretended it was more important to him?

I'm not being anti-Royalist here. I'm genuinely interested in what others think.