Prince Andrew and the Moral Law

I suspect along with legal advice there is a lot of RF PR work going on about how best to sell this to the great British Public. PA's last attempt being an utter disaster. No M&H have gone they'll be looking for something else to keep him off the front-page. Wedding/baby/engagement anyone?

legal advice does not address issues of morality

Would you like to comment Anniebach

In a previous life, I had much to do with people who had taken legal advice. It frequently made their ultimate situation worse because legal advice does not address issues of morality.

annepl is it not possible he is taking legal advice.

Endlessstrife you don't need to explain. I think Suziewoozie has expkained already.

Anniebach I don't know what she said - you know that! But I am assuming she didn’t tell him to cooperate as he hasn't done so.

Some folk just play silly games on GN.

Threads don’t work like that Pant Soz

I suspect PA is currently thinking things through and wondering "How old was that girl Jeffrey gave me for my birthday? She was 16 wasn't she? Wasn't she?"

Actually I’m more interested in endlessstrife thoughts on ‘normal’ family than yours suz , seeing as it was her post I queried.

Clearly annie but some occupy such low moral ground that they can’t bring themselves to criticise PA but just bleat that he hasn’t been charged with anything.

Not everyone has reached your moral high ground suziewoozie

Pant we are not talking about unemployment or disability. The point is that the RF do not behave like or are treated like the rest of us. If my 59 year old son ( if I had one) was in this position I’d ask myself what I’d done to contribute to such a moral degenerate. I wouldn’t be going to church with him or horse riding ( if I did either). But then an AC of mine wouldn’t be reliant on me either for every penny he had or have garnered suspicious riches from dubious contacts simply because he was my son.

The question of moral law hardly arises if we are dealing with PA or indeed with any members of the RF. They are the epitome of influence and privilege. They don't believe anything they do or anyone they are personally involved with can do any wrong. You only have to look at PA's friendship with Epstein and P Charles' letters to Peter Ball, disgraced bishop, to realise they either know what is going on or imagine that because they are so superior no one they know would ever be capable of such things. So they are either morally or intelectually bankrupt.

So suzie a family where parent(s) are unemployed and/or disabled, and on benefits are not ‘normal’? And for the record, I don’t do idols - we all have feet of clay.

annepl do tell, what did the queen say to him ?

I don’t know what a normal family is

Spot on annepl

Some people will misread (deliberately) any post in order to avoid criticising their idols.

I think we all know perfectly well what endlessstrife means by "normal". And I agree with her.

The queen should have told Andrew to cooperate, regardless of what the US does. Instead of attending church with him. If he has done nothing wrong he has nothing to fear.

I thought the same Pantglas

Pant what are you talking about? The word ‘normal’ was used as an adjective to describe the noun ‘family’. Your post to ‘endless’ made no sense at all

Just adding a fact , RF cost each taxpayer approx 69p last year .

I think Andrew should make himself available fr interview by the FBI, in this country. Allowing himself to be summoned to the US would look too much like an admission of guilt. And we do want to hold onto some measure of respect for our royal family.

Anyway, didn't I read that he had no idea they were asking for him to go out there? Have they submitted a formal request to him, or are they just waiting for him to approach them? Lazy or what!

Seems a very harsh attitude endlessstrife - suggesting that unemployed, disabled etc are not ‘normal’ because they’re paid for by British tax payer!

One not paid for by the British tax payer.

What is a normal family ?