Gransnet forums

Science/nature/environment

Population

(122 Posts)
carboncareful Tue 04-Oct-11 22:42:05

This month, October, a baby will be born who will bring the population of this planet up to 7 billion.....

jeni Wed 22-Feb-12 22:06:22

bag what are you drinking? I'll have one! Or two!

bagitha Wed 22-Feb-12 22:05:48

It was rabbits earlier. One of my favourite number is the googol. Google pinched the name.

bagitha Wed 22-Feb-12 22:02:29

gact?,..... fact.

Ariadne Wed 22-Feb-12 22:02:26

OK, bagitha that's a fair ecological answer. But the subject was Maths, wasn't it? Oxon7 where are you? smile

bagitha Wed 22-Feb-12 22:02:10

Lots of things eat rabbits. In gact, aren't rabbits just food for other animals?

jeni Wed 22-Feb-12 22:00:05

They run out of food! ( unless they can swim to the next island) {rabbits that swim?}

jeni Wed 22-Feb-12 21:57:48

Actually, thinking about it if you started with two rabbits, one male one female! Presuming the the offspringare 50% male and female! The first generation would not be so large! But following that it works, allowing for incest!
Does that bother rabbits?
Sorry for this
I've got that sort of mind!

bagitha Wed 22-Feb-12 21:56:58

The idea is that on a limited island with limited resources they would eat all the food and all die of starvation. Disaster scenario for the human population of the Earth. It's not that simple, of course.

Ariadne Wed 22-Feb-12 21:54:48

Yes, thanks jeni that's the way I was thinking. But why "None at all."? Think I'm being thick, somehow. sad

jeni Wed 22-Feb-12 21:50:08

Fibonacci is basically a spiral. Rabbits are 10 times 10 times ten. I can't remember the mathematical formula. But basically if 2rabbits have 10 offspring. Each of those offspring have 10 offspringetc. Ok?

Ariadne Wed 22-Feb-12 21:41:58

Oxon70- I'm confused. I was thinking Fibonacci but that doesn't work. I'm probably missing a vital point. confused Help me!! I won't sleep!

jeni Wed 22-Feb-12 21:23:55

Not until Marie stopes came along. But even the Romans knew about sponges soaked in vinegar and Casanova used condoms.
I suspect a certain amount of the problem was keeping women 'in child' so that they didn't get silly ideas about not having to rely on men!
Don't get me wrong, I am NOT a bra burning feminist, but as a medical student in the sixties, when the ratio was 1 woman to 20 men! You had to be brighter than the men to succeed!
I have always regarded myself as at least equal to any man!
I had to fight for my equality and am pleased that I succeeded!
Ok I've had my rant! Any comments?

Oxon70 Wed 22-Feb-12 21:02:06

There was no way not to, except abstention, was there?

jeni Wed 22-Feb-12 21:00:39

Infant mortality was high. If you didn't have lots of children, you might end up with none.

Oxon70 Wed 22-Feb-12 20:56:31

I think it got through, because a few weeks later he said 'Grandma, do you think S (friend of my daughter) has too many children? (Six. Five boys under 7.)

I said 'Well, I wouldn't say it to her...and they're here now...but yes, I do think she has too many.'

(I really cannot imagine what it was like in the 1800s when nearly everyone had six or more - my gggrandfather had 13....)

carboncareful Mon 20-Feb-12 18:19:02

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant!

Oxon70 Mon 20-Feb-12 10:40:50

I started educating my grandson - wish I had thought of it with the other older three, but they haven't started producing yet (crossing all fingers) - by giving him a maths problem, about rabbits.
I.e, to work out what happens with two rabbits on a small island.....having ten babies a year, I think it was. For the babies to have ten the next year - and so on. When we got to the sixth year, I asked him how many rabbits, and he started working it out.
I stopped him and said 'None at all'.

carboncareful Sun 19-Feb-12 16:07:10

just noticed spelling: sorry Polly Toynbee. I'm such a hopeless speller

carboncareful Wed 15-Feb-12 18:37:23

Did anyone read Polly Toynby in the Guardian yesterday? Unbelievable - she must have been brainwashed by George Monbiot.

Carol Thu 03-Nov-11 13:08:28

I certainly think the bit about insisting couples read about contraception and answer questions is a great idea.

carboncareful Thu 03-Nov-11 13:02:18

Just been reading in today's Guardian that China has a tradition of unwanted girl babies going back centuries. Of course the one-child policy exacerbated it but now they are addressing this problem and apparently succeeding.

I may be repeating myself but I have a friend whose son has a Chinese wife and lives in China. In order to get their baby's birth papers they had to read a booklet on contraception and answer questions on it to prove they understood. I think that sounds a good idea.

carboncareful Tue 01-Nov-11 16:19:53

The trick about falling birthrates is to balance dependants so that as the number of old people to be looked after increases the number of children to be cared for/educated decreases.

jingle Tue 01-Nov-11 11:44:08

notso! grin

jingle Tue 01-Nov-11 11:43:34

You'd think it would, wouldn't you Gracesmum! grin

gracesmum Tue 01-Nov-11 11:37:50

Surely one of the problems with ageing populations and a falling birth rate is that there will be nobody working and thereby generating income to pay for our pensions?
To digress to the 7 billionth baby I was so disappointed that is was not my new (still expected) GC - although how anybody knows is a mystery to me. Does something go "kerching!" like in a fruit machine and loits of gold coins come tumbling out?