Another statement on global warning, some corrections to the lies printed, and the incomplete investigations made.The subject is so complex that these new results are probably based on biased, and incomplete investigations. Nice to have your name associated with a "paper"however.Am surprised that this post has not attracted more attention. I am not saying that the opinions, and that is all they are, are not in some way relevant, they may be. The subject has not been investigated to the extent that is required to say without fear of contradiction, that we are the main causes of global warming. And by WE I don't mean GN.
Regarding political pressure, it is a very short term thing that politicians involve themselves with on the scale of this subject, they will be long gone, and have been much richer, by the time the effects of their interference is manifested.They,and others like them, have a greater effect on climate change than almost anything WE do.
My earlier remarks on survival of the fittest were related to the interference with natural processes that we are constantly attempting to manipulate,many times to good effect,but often with questionable results. Lives are being saved that rightly should not. Harsh though it may sound some are just not meant to survive to pass on defects that dilute the stock, natural selection is there for a reason.
Has anyone noticed what is happening with our "moggies"they are being nurtured,as they should be, are being neutered, and so good cats are not producing. It is mainly the uncared for cats that are breeding, and a wealth of feral cats are taking their place.I suppose that this is survival of the fittest, in a way that our engineering didn't really envisage?