Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Has anyone on GN got the right to give private information about you?

(593 Posts)

GNHQ have commented on this thread. Read here.

Fleurpepper Mon 12-Dec-22 17:02:28

Surely not. People on GN should have the right to anonimity, unless they choose to divulge any private information, be it about profession, locality, ethnicity, or whatever.

Secondly, should any information given in a PM be fair game to share to other members? Surely not.

VioletSky Sun 18-Dec-22 13:16:15

Anyway I'm offski before someone manages to get me banned again for sticking up for myself

VioletSky Sun 18-Dec-22 13:14:41

Lol

DARVO

It's always the same

If something is said that's a bit too obviously nasty we suddenly get an influx of silly comments to distract from it.

Then a round of "that never happened"

Then we get " if people don't name and shame it's passive aggressive" even though naming and shaming will be mass reported

But if anyone else reports they are beneath contempt

Then if anything does get reported there is mass paranoia and inevitably blame where it doesn't belong

It's just so predictable

It ruins the forum

Iam64 Sun 18-Dec-22 13:04:48

I too am Spartacus on the X front I expect.

Passive aggressive behaviour causes significant distress to those of the receiving end, particularly within family and friendship groups. All to often it’s denied, the perpetrator claiming to have been misunderstood. On they to, claiming to be the victims

Doodledog Sun 18-Dec-22 12:36:49

VioletSky

It's always the same names making personal comments

You just get used to it after awhile

I just tend to think, if x doesn't like me I must be doing something right

Isn't that a personal comment, VS? Poor x must be devastated. The whole basis for the unpleasantness on this thread is that making digs without naming people directly is no different from being upfront when it comes to bullying. It's far worse, actually, as passive aggression can always be denied, and the pointed digs can be (and often are) assumed to be about the wrong person, causing hurt to someone other than (or as well as) the person they were intended to hurt. It's not kind.

A quick skim of the thread doesn't show up any personal comments against you though - just a couple of mentions of things you have said. That is engagement, not personal comments. Anyone who posts on a thread can expect their posts to be replied to.

Saying that you are going to ignore someone, now - that is getting personal. There are a lot of double standards on this thread.

Sorry you're going through this unpleasantness, x. We're all here for you if you need a shoulder flowers.

VioletSky Sun 18-Dec-22 12:18:21

It's always the same names making personal comments

You just get used to it after awhile

I just tend to think, if x doesn't like me I must be doing something right

Farzanah Sun 18-Dec-22 11:13:12

I feel totally out in the cold on this one.
It’s a bit like Harry & Meghan’s Netflix to me. Much ado about very little, but has attracted excessive attention and comment.

BaBaBoom Sun 18-Dec-22 10:39:52

Iam64 👏👏👏 well summarised.

Marydoll Sun 18-Dec-22 10:19:24

Iam64, totally agree.

Callistemon21 Sun 18-Dec-22 10:11:12

Iam64

This OP was started with the aim of causing problems. Having followed it, it’s difficult not to conclude the OP hoped to manipulate and goad so that a ban or suspension may result. The comments from gaga alleging bullying tend to support that conclusion,

Why VioletSky enjoys being the victim of her ‘fan club’ remains a mystery to me.

A word if thanks to Doodledog for trying to keep this thread grounded in reality.

That is a good summing up, Iam64

Galaxy Sun 18-Dec-22 10:02:49

Ah that was the bit I was interested in.

kittylester Sun 18-Dec-22 09:36:58

Well, I think I know what this is all about - but who cares anyway.

Not sure there are famous spouses involved. That was a red herring.

MerylStreep Sun 18-Dec-22 09:13:26

Nail on the head, Iam64

Iam64 Sun 18-Dec-22 09:08:25

This OP was started with the aim of causing problems. Having followed it, it’s difficult not to conclude the OP hoped to manipulate and goad so that a ban or suspension may result. The comments from gaga alleging bullying tend to support that conclusion,

Why VioletSky enjoys being the victim of her ‘fan club’ remains a mystery to me.

A word if thanks to Doodledog for trying to keep this thread grounded in reality.

Callistemon21 Sat 17-Dec-22 22:26:21

😁

Blossoming Sat 17-Dec-22 22:21:13

Callistemon21

Blossoming

Ok I’ll fess up. I am the Grand Duchess of Elbonia and I’m married to George Clooney’s better looking twin brother.

Please don’t tell anyone.

Is that the one I divorced because he dropped his dirty socks on the floor?

No, he’s much younger than that one.

Callistemon21 Sat 17-Dec-22 22:09:23

Blossoming

Ok I’ll fess up. I am the Grand Duchess of Elbonia and I’m married to George Clooney’s better looking twin brother.

Please don’t tell anyone.

Is that the one I divorced because he dropped his dirty socks on the floor?

Blossoming Sat 17-Dec-22 21:36:58

Thank you Delila

Delila Sat 17-Dec-22 21:33:48

Your secret’s safe on here…

Blossoming Sat 17-Dec-22 21:28:30

Ok I’ll fess up. I am the Grand Duchess of Elbonia and I’m married to George Clooney’s better looking twin brother.

Please don’t tell anyone.

Delila Sat 17-Dec-22 21:28:10

Well, it seems the disclosure of someone else’s personal information (if that’s what this is about🤔) has gone completely unnoticed by most of us, so no harm done and not worth any more going round in endless meaningless circles leading nowhere.

GagaJo Sat 17-Dec-22 21:27:34

Ooops. Can't even use the excuse I was on my phone. I wasn't.

Callistemon21 Sat 17-Dec-22 21:26:57

Gangsta

(Sorry, Pedants' Corner))

GagaJo Sat 17-Dec-22 21:18:41

VioletSky

Pile on

Yeah. Same old, same old.

Gansta grannies.

VioletSky Sat 17-Dec-22 21:06:56

"Tired of this nonsense"

MawtheMerrier Sat 17-Dec-22 21:06:24

Is there a word for the opposite?
One person lashing out in every direction or is it what we Scots call “a rammy in an empty room” ?