Has anyone on GN got the right to give private information about you?

Soooooo, have I got this right? Three posters which are Fleurpepper and Gagajo and VioletSky have seen something although can’t say what it is, or who has done it, but know that mean things are being said or being done.Or not.
That’s clear as mud ain’t it?
Nobody else has a scooby as to what’s going on.Or cares.😂

VioletSky

Someone asked if anyone git a message from RevChris

I did so I said so

Maybe don't carry animosity across threads and you won't think you arebbeing got at

I just find it all very boring

Nothing to do with this. The Rev Chris was an entirely different thread. I was talking about you saying something had just happened to you where someone had mentioned something about qualifications. And something about narcissism. And a reference to someone saying something about your work. All on this thread. Obviously it's up to you what you post, but for someone who finds all of this boring, you have made a number of contributions! From what you've said, it seems that you think whatever 'it' is is about you, so why not say what's going on, so that people can defend themselves if they need to?

I'm not carrying animosity across threads, just speaking up when I see bullying. There was a similar thread a while ago (in the sense that unspecified accusations were made against Some People), and the consensus seemed to be that when we see such behaviour we should deal with it on the thread, rather than 'let things fester'.

I don't think that I am being got at (am I?). I doubt it, as I have rarely interacted with the OP, and have no clue about the numerous subtexts that seem to be going on. I plead innocent, if I am in the frame, but innocent of what, I'm not sure .

I see other people being got at - with no substance to the accusations, and suggestions that the fact that people who may be on a warning could be banned if they speak out (again about something unspecified). I think that is threatening and bullying behaviour, which is why I mentioned it. That's all.

Sorry tickingbird, just thread-hopping like everyone seems to do these days. The comment was was meant to show how bonkers this thread is, but probably should have landed on the Strictly one instead!
No disrespect to choir boys intended.

This nonsense really annoys me - when little in jokes or whatever are brought into a thread and then go off on a tangent. What is this about choir boys?? I find it really rude tbh and will leave you all to it

Confusing certainly

Someone asked if anyone git a message from RevChris

I did so I said so

Maybe don't carry animosity across threads and you won't think you arebbeing got at

I just find it all very boring

If someone asks a question, I will answer it if I want to

Nothing to do with getting at anyone

I'd assume people who are doing the mean things know they are doing it and don't need it to be pointed out anyway

Oh, pity, I could have tried to up my % share of the dosh by offering a tenner to the Cathedral fund

Now you've lost me yet again Callistemon!

No, he is the angelic choir boy chorister in the back row! He'd never do such a naughty thing. 😇

I'm off to the Strictly thread. It's far more simple and transparent

Sorry, I may have just wrecked it 😫

👏 👏 👏 Doodledog.
Suggesting that something 'vile' is going on that most people don't know about, but is bad enough to lead to people being banned is insidious behaviour, as it is divisive and causes unnecessary speculation and mistrust amongst posters.
I can explain or excuse most things on GN, but this one is sinister and unsettling.

Then along comes the next round of posters to introduce bullying and victimisation comments, even veiled threats. How weird is all this, and what is the hidden agenda?

I don't know, but it leaves a nasty taste.

FannyCornforth

Perhaps ‘some people’ (meaning everyone) should simply focus on their own contributions and interactions, instead of that of others

Along the lines of what Fanny said, I do wonder why original posters start these kind of threads and what they are hoping to achieve. Lots of other posters come along to give sound advice, some suggest reasons or answers and some, like me, express bewilderment and probably muddy the waters even more. Then along come the ones who throw their arms in feigned or true, shock and horror.
Why open up a thread if you know what you already believe, just to encounter opposition and accusations? I don't get it.
Then along comes the next round of posters to introduce bullying and victimisation comments, even veiled threats. How weird is all this, and what is the hidden agenda?

I'm off to the Strictly thread. It's far more simple and transparent.

VioletSky

doodledog

What do you mean by "My firing line"?

All I've said is that I have seen something happen, not who did it

It is the behaviour that is to blame, not the person reacting to it

I mean the people who may think you are getting at them, and have others think that you are getting at them. You don't think that firing shots about 'something happening' and 'blameworthy behaviour' without saying 'who did it' is victimless, do you? I assume that you want someone, or Some People to take note of what you are saying, but this thread has established that nobody has much of a clue about what's happening, so accusations are very likely to hurt the wrong people. In a world where you can be anything, #BeKind?

Fanny, if that works for you, great - go ahead and focus on yourself; but I am fed up with this sort of thing. I have said before (as have others) that bullying behaviour should be tackled when it happens, and I think that this is what is going on here. The 'Some People' accusations are tedious, and happen regularly, and I am putting my money where my mouth is and calling it out. Suggesting that something 'vile' is going on that most people don't know about, but is bad enough to lead to people being banned is insidious behaviour, as it is divisive and causes unnecessary speculation and mistrust amongst posters.

Perhaps ‘some people’ (meaning everyone) should simply focus on their own contributions and interactions, instead of that of others

doodledog

What do you mean by "My firing line"?

All I've said is that I have seen something happen, not who did it

It is the behaviour that is to blame, not the person reacting to it

VioletSky

Feel pretty vindicated by the comments tbh

Have seen the behaviour described

Do think it's vile

As is the "it never happened" invalidating nonsense

I don't know what 'never happened' as I don't know what 'it' is supposed to have been. how can someone invalidate something without knowing what it is?

Flinging accusations about without saying who is being accused of what is, IMO, pretty low behaviour. It will be upsetting for those in your firing line, and may also upset those who wrongly feel they've been targeted.

Meryl perhaps ‘the OP’ means ‘the opening post’

Crossed posts, VioletSky!!

MerylStreep, I assumed that Fleurpepper meant Original Post, not Original Poster.

OP = original post or original poster

Fleurpepper

Doodledog, the OP never mentionned bullying, and never pointed the finger at anyone.

Why are you talking about yourself in the 3rd person. You are are the OP.
That should read i never mentioned bullying.

Feel pretty vindicated by the comments tbh

Have seen the behaviour described

Do think it's vile

As is the "it never happened" invalidating nonsense

Ooops! that was to the OP.

No, I realise that, except that at some point there was talk of a poster mentioning information about you, which wasn't difficult to find. It was GagaJo (I think) who brought bullying into it, warned people about the risk of being banned, and dragged it out for a number of pages, then told us all to let it drop.

I didn't understand the bit where VioletSky mentioned something about a dig on a different thread, and a narcissist's prayer, but that seemed to be pointing a finger at someone. No wonder people were bewildered - the oddness was coming from all ends and sides .