So the current position among social care provided by local authorities is to push care in the home as it is less costly than residential care (the official line is it is where people want to be). Many people in this thread have commented about 15 minute visits, care workers less effective if unmonitored, choices between eating or maintaining continence.
My question is: how are CQC able to monitor this situation and what is their viewpoint on these comments? Are 15 minute visits sufficient? How can the boundaries between care at home and residential care be drawn so that people's care needs (and not finances) are at the forefront?
Obviously when asked where they want to be most people will say they want to be at home (the shadow of the workhouse endures), but does anyone ever go back after six months to check that this is still the case? That the person is not incredibly lonely, sick of choosing between food and continence? Do they offer the chance to look at residential homes before making their decisions so that choices are real and meaningful?
By special request, let’s discuss our favourite Classic Music and why?
Good Morning Friday 15th May 2026
Please note: This topic is for discussions paid for by Gransnet clients. If you'd like to have your own paid for discussion thread, please feel free to mail us at 