I disagree Parsley they are no longer the "go to" for good school uniform basics. And the last time I bought childrens clothes there the colours ran in the wash! Unheard of when my kids were little!
How did you vote and why today
I disagree Parsley they are no longer the "go to" for good school uniform basics. And the last time I bought childrens clothes there the colours ran in the wash! Unheard of when my kids were little!
M&S just can't get their clothing right
They should just stick to food and expand in that area.
M&S food and children’s clothes are still worth buying but as for dressing women it lost its way years ago. I no longer shop there for my clothes and I have switched allegiance to Laura Ashley.
M&S have shot themselves in the foot by turning their back on their traditional target market to appeal to who exactly? They cannot compete with the youth brands so why are they trying?
They are no good for the "boring" stuff any more: socks, tights etc have gone down hill. I want to be able to go there to AVOID the fashioney "on trend" stuff that would look silly on a middle aged woman like me!
Hiring trans bra fitting staff and trying to be all hip for who? My DDs and younger family members arent interested, their have their own brands!
Well actually
My 12 year old grand daughter reckons that M&S is the best place to buy clothes.
Out with her over half term, she walked straight past Next and New Look and into M&S. Primark didn't get a mention.
She had £20 to spend and bought a really sassy pinafore dress. My only complaint was that she had to get a size that just fitted now as the store was almost completely devoid of the next size up in any style. Have you tried to get a 12 year old to wait a day or two and get it online?
I had heard the interview on R4, where the question of having all sizes in stock came up and the woman interviewed said they had overcome this problem and size range in store was much better. Well, not if DGD and my experience is typical. I had previously tried to buy a a specific pair of trousers a few weeks previously and had visited 2 M&S's to find no size 12, long length in either. In fact no size 12s at all across the range and no longer lengths in any size.
M&S lost the plot some time ago. They have tried to reinvent themselves so many times its ridiculous. I bought lots of clothing from their Indigo range and often got complimented on it, then off it went for no apparent reason.
The Classic range was always a bit frumpy so no idea how it survived as long as it did.
I used to buy quite a lot of things from their French site but that is so reduced now it's hardly worth bothering.
I agree that axing the classic range is probably because of lower sales. As someone up thread said those that would have bought it were older and many now want to wear younger maybe more casual , comfortable clothes. The only person I know who would buy that range is my 88 year old MIL. I still love their underwear, trousers of various types and have t-shirts and jumpers.
Must admit that their classics range was usually a bit too 'classic' for me, and I'm 70.
I find much of the standard range stuff less than enticing - horrible cheap looking colours/colour combinations, esp. the current crop of jumpers.
But having said that, the other day I did see a nice plain cowl-neck jumper - long enough to wear with leggings - in soft Cashmilon, for only £15. I was dithering between a soft red and a dark slate blue - went for the slate blue but shall now go back for the red - if they still have my size....
I imagine its because it wasn't selling. Perhaps the older generation these days wear the same as everyone else and no longer buy classics unless they are good ones which will last and not from M & S.
They do send me questionnaires about my opinion but not sure they know my age.
I think we can look round the high street and see for ourselves which shops are not keeping up. I can think of a few which might have limited life.
They'll probably still do similar clothing but it won't be called that. It'll be given a trendier name.
I know a few youngsters who like the Classic range because they do little tops and cardigans that suit the 'preppy' look the young ones aiming for. They cut out the labels, though! 
Oh dear Marks. What has become of you?
Well fitting, well made staples at a fair price. Long gone.
I asked an assistant where the classic range had been moved to when I was looking for a present for my aunt last week,I could not believe they have discontinued it, surely they know the people who want the classic range are the people who have loyally built their business over the years. Looking around the store I wondered who are the designers and who chooses the fabrics both of which leave a lot to be desired. I can't remember the last time that I saw something in store that I just had to have. They need to start asking customers what they would like to see and stop aiming at an age group that would never wear anything but their knickers
I bought the Classic range for my late mum
she was always quite happy with their stuff, but she was early to mid 80s at the time.
Marks doesn't appeal to a younger demographic it's too middle of the road, yet in spite of that, their stance on mixed changing rooms is amazing (not in a good way though) A potentially uncomfortable and unacceptable experience for women having bra fittings and discussing matters pertaining to that with the fitter, if a man is in the next door cublicle...........and yet their profits are down 17% and they still feel they can piss of their core customer 
I must admit that I think I've only ever bought once from the Classic Range. However I do miss the Indigo range which did super longish cotton sweaters. I also miss the quality of Portfolio though it would usually have been a sale purchase.
There was an interview on tv the other night with the Executive Buyer for M & S who was very enthusiastic about turning the fashion range around within 3 years.
I agree that any younger folk that I know wouldn't be making M & S clothing their first stop.
I was disappointed to read today that M and S we’re stopping their Classic range of clothes aimed at women 55 or over. I often by jackets and tops from that range and jazz them up with scarves and jewellery.
M and S say they want to appeal to a broader range of shoppers ! Oh yes by reducing the number of ranges such as Limited, Portfolio and Indigo. ???
I wonder if they ever ask older S shoppers what they want. From my experience younger shoppers wouldn’t be seen dead in M and S, other than in the Food Hall.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.