quizqueen Of course, people who commit crimes, and, in particular, violent crimes against others should be punished. But locking people up for years on end without trying to address all the issues that have contributed to their criminality means that, in large part, the cycle of criminality will continue - and it does.
Recidivism in this country is high so the system we have at the moment cannot be regarded as successful since one of the aims of punishment is claimed to be rehabilitation. The US system, which is very much more punitive, is even less effective in reforming people - although in the US the imprisonment of people also yields good profits to private providers of services and goods.
Other countries have adopted a less punitive and more therapeutic approach, which has cut rates of recidivism dramatically. No doubt there will be a howl of outrage at this suggestion, with some people saying that "going soft on criminals" would be a betrayal of the victim. But if it is more effective in preventing them, on their release, creating more victims, surely it is an option that should be explored? I do agree, though, that more resources should be made available to victims of crime, as they appear to get little support in the lead up to a trial.