I don't think that age gaps are an issue, other than between the people concerned. It becomes an issue when there is a huge power imbalance, and when the young person is too young to make mature decisions.
It looks as though Schofield's PR has played a blinder. The 'poor me' narrative, the messed up hair and make-up free appearance, and the egregious use of Caroline Flack has left the media in a position where they have to bow to the blackmail implicit in the suicide threats, and public sympathy seems to be turning.
Scholfield mentioned paying the runner's legal costs as though that is magnanimous of him, but why would the boy need a lawyer at this stage? He won't be paying for an expensive PR team, will he? I would be interested to know if this representation is from the same lawyers as Schofield (which I assume is legal as this is not yet an adversarial situation). If that is the case, the implications are obvious.
How ironic - some HMRC staff essentially committing fraud.
US troops forced to act on the ground?

