eazybee
He was door-stepped by a woman shouting out questions as he got into his car. Not a serious interview.
The (alleged) corruption and bullying at ITV is a serious matter though. As was said in the enquiry, it doesn't give the impression that a 'staffer' going to him with concerns would be taken seriously, does it?
In all of this, are people forgetting that 'poor' Phillip Schofield is on record as having known about his brother abusing a young man to the extent that he got 12 years in jail, yet did nothing about it? That is not gossip - he admitted it in court.
There is no doubt that people at ITV (including Frizell) knew about it, yet they kept him on. Had the boy not had the courage to come forward three months later, it could still be going on. As it was, he suffered for at least three months longer than he needed to.
When the story of his brother broke, my first thought was that nobody should be blamed for the actions of someone else; but finding out that this wasn't the lie that PS told (that it was consensual masturbation and a one-off), but prolonged abuse serious enough to get 12 years was enough in itself to tip the balance on that one. Then there's the fact that the world and their dog knew about the runner and the fake 'coming out' pantomime. Again, at face value, it seemed like 'just a workplace affair' that happens all the time, and is nobody's business, but then the links to the stage school and so on came out and it took on a different light.
I cannot for the life of me understand why people are so keen to defend him after all of that, or at least wonder why he didn't lose his job before he did.