I'd seen the documentary on the murders so knew what was going to happen. No amount of not watching would have changed the outcome in real life, but no one needs to watch any programme if they don't want to.
It has been harrowing to watch but it made me think a lot
We are always wise after the event aren't we but it showed a lot of tactics of abusive people.
Managing to hone in on vulnerable people, love bombing, including moving quickly, finding out what meant a lot to them, eg writing poetry to them, using religion,, making themselves irreplaceable, cutting them off from their family's support, in different ways in this case, in Peters situation, blackening his name by claiming he was an alcoholic, in Anns case by trying her loyalty to her niece and him, making it hard for normal things such as meeting the family.
Gaslighting, spiritual abuse, animal.cruelty, all there
The programme also showed how important it is for relatives to try and protect their vulnerable and lonely loved ones. Had the niece not acted as she did would he have gone.on to kill more vulnerable people, yes indubitably. No idea if it was true but the taking on of the coffin bearer role to sniff out grieving partners was an indication that yes always on the look out for a new victim
Also how difficult it is for relatives when cases do come to trial, how the press behave. You can begin to understand how sometimes victims say of child sex abuse just cannot bring themselves to speak against their abusers even many years later because of having to relive the trauma and risk not being believed after all that
I'm surprised that the red flags around a young member of the church with a responsible role befriended 2 vulnerable people and moved in with them. That should have raised some safeguarding issues eventually surely