I've posted on this before and there have been so many interesting views posted here that its impossible to namecheck them all.
I re-read The Talented Mr Ripley and am half way through Ripley Underground because I was interested in the various interpretations. I find that although I preferred the Damon Ripley to the Scott Ripley, I think the Scott Ripley is closer to the Highsmith Ripley in there's more of a sense of the unhinged/psychopath with less unrequited love for/personal interest in Dickie and a quicker more avaricious decision to do the first,( Dickie's) murder .I think I still wasn't 100% on board with Scott's version. I did think that it was a quality production and did watch the whole thing and enjoyed it.
I agree that the interpretation of the Freddie Miles character failed (for me). Phillip S-Hoffman was typically brilliant as the cruel, bullying snob and physically , being burly, was just right in the part. I thought the effete version(had no idea it was a woman) failed completely and I wondered why they had picked such a bad actor!(Sorry!)
Jude Law made some interesting comments on the contrast between the two versions citing the influence of the Directors' styles , Minghella's( film?) being more romantic that would explain the emphasis on unrequited love being a larger part of the Dickie murder motive and the actual murder scene containing I thought more of an element of personal provocation.
The film won a clutch of Oscars? I think. Not that that's a guarantee of anything.
Killers of the Flower Moon was a dreadful film IMO and that got nominated this year.
Sorry I do go on a bit.......