For 'Spuddy' - well done, one of the daftest comments I've ever seen (usually strong competition). If you don't watch TV, then you don't need a licence. Re 'Ant & Dec' and 'Amanda Holden', well, you ARE keeping them in jobs -- unless of course you never ever buy any product that does TV ads?!
For meddijess, and 'biased reporting', absolute twaddle. You can watch news on ITV, C4, Sky, and you'll see much the same. Oh, BTW, WHAT percentage of the BBC's output, across TV and Radio, 7 days a week, is 'news'. Look at the schedules, and work it out, but the amount is tiny.
What in any case is 'biased'? Having seen many similar comments, under questioning, it turns out that folk do not like something about THEIR party, that's all. It's been shown in many election coverages that people see and hear exactly what THEY want to, YOUR nasty biased question to Corbyn or Abbott might be want masses of others DO want to see. It was the Tories who started to attack the BBC, when Cameron got embarrassed one day by a tough question. Corbyn wanted to have a politician on the BBC Board to make sure Labour interests could be promoted!
The BBC has faults, sure, but so does any big firm -- tried to get British Gas to do anything on time lately, or a water firm to fix a leak?! And BBC is widely respected all over the world, and for a good reason, it's worth the fee for the lovely ads-free website alone, let alone their vast and varied output, on TV and radio.