I read the discussion on Ravelry. Itâs been going on since last summer when the programme was in development and applications to take part invited. This was the original concept:
www.channel4.com/press/news/more4-cast-new-competitive-knitting-series-game-wool
I have no gripe with Tom Daley but would have preferred Ryan Gosling!
Extracts:
⊠each episode sees the knitters tackle two challenges: âThe Big Knitâ where theyâll be working together in teams on an extremely complex project, as well as âThe Wee Knitâ where theyâll take on individual briefs that will really test their capabilitie [and] skill level âŠ
our formidable pair of experts [Gilpin and Greenwell] wonât be alone, each week theyâll be joined by a celebrity guest judge whoâll help them decide who goes through and whoâll be âcast offâ home.
Iâm assuming that now means Daley every week.
Iâve been think about why the format doesnât work (for me anyway) and thatâs because itâs too static. It has taken the format of GBBO, Sewing Bee and Pottery Throwdown which involve dynamic crafts and and mapped it onto a static craft. Watching people sitting knitting just isnât exciting.
Part of the excitment of the other shows is seeing contestants moving about from take to task and dashing to get finished even itâs only from counter top to fridge or slopping on some last minute icing; from sewing machine to haberdashery to mannekin or model, machine sewing bits of garments which should be handsewn, pinning things and hoping Esme doesnât notice; from wheel to drying room and the jeopardy of the kiln god. Plus on Throwdown, we have the enjoyment of seeing the judges Keith and Rich and occasional guests demonstrate their skills.
I love to knit but it isnât exciting to watch. What does one do under time pressure? Just knit a bit faster.
And where GoW has copied the blind judging format, it just doesnât work in the context of a group project. Surely part of the judging should take into account how well people worked together, who put in more effort, who was more innovative. I didnât watch the whole sofa cover challenge (bored with the frequent long ad breaks) just the end result so maybe viewers did see some discussion as the works were in progress. It seemed to me that the person who went home was judged only or primarily on a bad technical error in the first round but maybe he was equally poor in the second.