Jane43
MayBee70
Well I stuck with it but that’s six hours of my life I won’t get back. Ended up having to Google what actually happened in the end only to find that the writer struggled with the ending but likes ambiguous endings which, to me, are a cop out. I wonder if he has questioned whether viewers like investing their time watching something to find out what happened only to be no wiser at the end of six episodes than they were at the beginning. I think not.I haven’t put spoiler alert at the top of this by the way as I think I’m the only person on here ( and possibly the world) stupid enough to continue watching this depressing series.
I have watched it all, I am in a minority as I thought it was excellent, very Shakespearean. The ending wasn’t ambiguous at all, the penultimate episode and the last episode made the outcome clear.
But this is what the writer said of it…
SPOILER ALERT
“Gadd is protective of the ending, preferring that people take what they want from it, and he left things intentionally ambiguous. “In a roundabout way, the show has asked you to fill in the gaps between episodes—the years that go by, the things that have happened. Therefore, it felt fitting in a lot of ways, that for a fundamentally contorted and complicated relationship, that there was an ending that was left open to interpretation,” says Gadd”