POGS
Mr. Webb
I have no question but I will post that I totally agree with the governments decision to 'allow', a very horrible term, war widows to remarry and keep their war widows pensions.
I will start a new thread so that this one remains a question and answer thread.
OldMike
I have very little to add to what Norfolksetter has already written.
But I was surprised to learn that military widows who re-marry will now be able to keep their widow's pensions. Would it be cynical to suggest that an inexpensive gesture that appeals to sentiment and patriotism is a cheaper vote winner than justice and fairness for old people who worked hard for their pensions.
The campaign to enable war widows to retain their pensions in the event of remarriage has been a powerful one and the government has accepted the strength of their argument, particularly given that we have an 'armed forces covenant' written into law which is about trying to tackle some of the disadvantages which people and their families can face when they serve their country.
Of course, doing the right thing by war widows, doesn't mean we can't also give justice and fairness for older people. For example, after 30 years of decline of the state pension when the 'earnings link' was broken, the Coalition reinstated it in 2010 and has introduced a 'triple lock guarantee' which means that each year the pension now rises by the highest of the growth in prices, earnings and a floor of 2.5%. As a result of this, the state pension is now a higher share of average earnings than at any point in more than two decades.