Gransnet forums

Work/volunteering

Why is it so difficult to find employees?

(154 Posts)
GillT57 Tue 11-Feb-14 17:38:09

I own a very successful domestic cleaning business and have a problem finding new staff. At present I have one staff member off on SMP ( seriously out of pocket as still waiting for HMRC to re-reimburse me) and another one off on SSP having had planned surgery( again out of pocket). I am trying to employ temp staff to cover the gaps, need a couple of people to work 16-18 hours a week and there is a distinct possibility of job becoming permanent. I pay quite well (£6.64 per hour plus generous car expenses) and we are a nice company with lovely clients. No weekends, no bank holidays, no evenings, no horrid early starts. When I offer people an interview, they either don't turn up angry or talk as if they are the ones doing me a favour! I try to be as flexible as possible, and my current staff have all been with me for ages and are lovely, but I cant keep asking them to do extra hours all the time. I don't use agency staff as cant afford to pay their rates, and besides which my very expensive public liability insurance precludes the use of casual or agency staff. I have listed the job with the job centre on Universal Jobmatch and on the Indeed job search site. Also got a company who work for Job Centre, but they keep ringing me with unsuitable candidates.......she is very nice, but can only work 9-1, or really great but cant work in a house where there are cats ( not much good as a cleaner then).....sorry to rant, and I truly am not an awful UKIP Daily Mail type ranting about benefit scroungers, in fact I read The Guardian, but just finding it so frustrating!!!! I just want to give someone a job for heaven's sake

gillybob Wed 12-Feb-14 08:32:47

My question to you durhamjen was what do you consider to be a living wage? Not what Boris considers it to be. Do you really think a family could live on £7.65 per hour? I don't think so.

JessM Wed 12-Feb-14 08:18:28

What a pity this thread has unleashed all this criticism of women trying to run their own businesses and provide legitimate jobs. Woman and Home magazine would be horrified (they seem obsessed with women starting businesses don't they).
As someone who runs her own business, albeit I am the only employee, I admire anyone who runs a law-abiding business which involves employing others.
It is easy to pontificate about tax evasion - but there is actually huge tax evasion in this sector - both by those who work in it and those who pay cash in hand and get services cheaper. (we've all done it, probably, with window cleaners , babysitters, cleaners, odd job men etc etc I certainly have. ). Your neighbours are probably the exception rather than the rule Galen in my experience.
Could we get back to the original post about the difficulty of employment - there are regional variations, huge ones, in unemployment and in rates of pay for services - hence my question about which region OP.
Probably best if we take this to a PM conversation OP

POGS Wed 12-Feb-14 00:37:44

durhamjen

Blimey, have I got this right.

You say , "If you are going to collect VAT for the government you have to take £100.000 to allow for VAT'.

If you pay your window cleaner £5 and hour and he pays tax and income tax but he doesn't want to 'collect VAT for the government', does that mean he earns over £1000.000 cleaning windows??? Or have I missed something. I do realise that you say there are two of them but I am confused why VAT comes into the equation unless he takes £1000.000 plus a year.

Also why don't you tell your window cleaner that you subscribe in principal to the living wage and you want to pay him what your conscience makes you do and increase his rate to £7.65 an hour! I am sure he could pay a little extra tax and national insurance.

I am shocked how much you can earn being a window technician.

absent Wed 12-Feb-14 00:29:23

I am so glad that I don't pay VAT any more.

durhamjen Wed 12-Feb-14 00:16:09

Do we have the same window cleaner? You live Tyne and Wear and I live Durham area. Highly unlikely, I would think. That would be a big round.

harrigran Wed 12-Feb-14 00:07:30

I too pay my window cleaner £5, he has been cleaning my windows for 42 years and I am dreading him announcing his retirement.

durhamjen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:57:04

www.livingwage.org.uk

durhamjen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:46:17

In which case GillT you should be fighting for everyone to pay their tax, rather than criticising people for not wanting to work for you for less than the living wage.
www.jrf.org.uk/blog
Joseph Rowntree Foundation take on the minimum and living wage.
Living wage £7.65 an hour, £8.80 in London.
Even Boris knows what the living wage is, Gillybob.

GillT57 Tue 11-Feb-14 23:35:58

sorry galen just read back and realised you were referring to the couple who do work for you, sorry, it got a bit out of order! I obviously do claim back vat on things that are legitimately purchased for the company, but there isn't much to be honest, just on my accountants fees, the odd bit of equipment, phone bill and such, doesn't amount to anything near what I charge out and have to collect. Also, HMRC are very hot on splitting businesses to keep them under the vat threshold, I did think about it, but couldn't be done. I also wonder how many of you have asked the staff at your supermarket checkout what they are paid? It will be just above the minimum wage, and just look at the profits their employers make! And the tax advantages they can afford to pay for......do you know that I pay more corporation tax than The Ritz hotel? and so do you gillybob......because they don't pay any!

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:30:51

Interesting discussion everyone. Goodnight all. moon

durhamjen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:30:39

I pay cash in hand to my window cleaner. He charges £5 and I have suggested every year that he puts it up. He does not want to as he is happy not collecting VAT for the taxman. He pays tax and national insurance - I have asked him - and pays them for his son who works for him. If he put the price up he would have to split the business between himself and his son, but would lose the help. His son climbs ladders, and he prefers not to.

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:28:19

Yes obviously durhamjen but the point I was trying to make was that we do not work for the public. We work business to business. It is only when you work for the public that the VAT threshold makes a huge difference. It is very hard for someone (legitimate ) over the threshold to compete with someone under the threshold (legitimate or otherwise) .

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:24:03

confused durhamjen the "living wage" is a load of tosh. There is no way most small businesses in the North east could pay a "real" living wage to every employee. The economy just couldn't take it and unemployment would skyrocket. I wonder what you consider to be a living wage anyway?

durhamjen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:23:21

I realise that, Gillybob. If you are going to collect VAT for the government you have to take £100,000 to allow for the VAT.
But businesses like cleaning and windowcleaning and painting and decorating can quite easily be split so that each person runs a different area and takes less than £79,000. Saving a lot of hassle.
Surely your company also claims VAT back on the goods you purchase?
As will GillT's business.

GillT57 Tue 11-Feb-14 23:23:16

Oh durhamjen i did not say that other people should not be self-employed, I just pointed out that as a small one person or 2 person business it is easy to be paid cash and not have all the associated costs of running a bigger vat registered business. I know of many business who keep their turnover below the magic figure, but maybe I am not a creative enough book keeper, I have an audit trail from timesheet to payroll to invoice. I think the vat threshold should be raised to encourage more business to hire people without the penalties of crossing that magic figure.

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:18:59

What are you talking about ? I am not a self employed engineer Durhamjen Yes we are an engineering company but no-one within the company is self employed !

durhamjen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:18:11

Gillybob, I'm on the side of the oppressed worker being expected to live on less than the living wage. And it's not the North/ South divide.

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:16:51

Our business is conducted on a business to business basis. We do not deal with the public and no cash changes hands ever (mores the pity). We charge VAT on all work we do and the businesses we work for will reclaim this via their own VAT returns. The problems for a small business doing work directly for the public (just above the threshold) is that they are forced to increase their charges to the customer by 20% in the £ which is a lot of money.

durhamjen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:14:35

Exactly, Galen. It's offensive to suggest otherwise. My first business I paid VAT. The next one I made sure I did not. I did not want to be a tax collector for the government. But I made sure that the staff I employed earned enough to be covered by NI, so they got sick pay and pensions.

Anyway, GillT, you are self employed running your own business. Why are you saying that other people should not be self employed cleaners?
Gillybob's business is different. Not everyone can be a self employed engineer.

GillT57 Tue 11-Feb-14 23:13:33

galen bit confused by your post? What has Church and /or senile dementia got to do with it? Or has this been mis posted? grinMy business is in the Colchester area, sorry wasn't being evasive, but feeling a little persecuted tonight to be honest. sad

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:12:22

Perhaps it's the North/South divide Galen . confused

gillybob Tue 11-Feb-14 23:08:50

Not sure what you mean durhamjen? Are you agreeing with the OP or disagreeing? You are right when you say that you must register for VAT with a turnover of over £79,000 although I know plenty of people who turn over much more than this but deal mainly in cash so don't declare it. It is surely up to the individual how much they pay/can afford to pay their cleaner but if they are knowingly paying cash in hand then they are supporting a black economy. Surely no-one runs their own business as a charity and would therefore expect some kind of income from doing so. However I can totally understand how the tables can easily turn and the employee is quite often the person holding all the cards while the employer runs faster and faster in order to stand still.

GillT57 Tue 11-Feb-14 23:08:41

Just so that nobody gets the wrong idea from durhamjem, the vat threshold is for turnover over £79,000 not profit. And yes, I suppose I am saying that the vat does affect what I can charge, and thus pay my staff, people look at the bottom line, they don't think 'oh it's ok, 20% of this is vat' If I employed fewer people, maybe fired four or five of them, then I could go under that vat threshold and pay my staff more. I don't think so. It is a tricky balance, and do remember that small business owners are not responsible for the hike in living costs, the extortionate amount that people pay in rent and all the associated factors affecting the cost of living. And I find the statement about living off other people's hard work truly hurtful, durhamjem did you really have to say that?

Galen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:03:52

Nor here!

Galen Tue 11-Feb-14 23:03:16

They pay their tax. They're obsessive about being legit. They don't employ anyone else.
Strangely, most of their employers are connected with the local church.
They look after several people with senile dementia.