No. But thank you anyway. 
Sometimes it’s just the small things that press the bruise isn’t it? 😢
No. But thank you anyway. 
I'm not sure that the approach is entirely correct. Retraining might not be a real necessity. What is really needed is help to use the training we already have in different ways and adapt our skills to the workplace. I trained as a teacher and since i retired have used my skills in voluntary work. So I have organised fundraising events, run walking tours, given talks to groups and been a volunteer guide. If I had been given guidance about the things I could do and the places my skills would fit I might have moved out of teaching as I got older but continued to work. Teaching is a demanding profession that it is difficult to continue in past 60. Mind you the voluntary sector will really lose out if the 60+s can't do their bit.
I'm 71 and still working. I would work until I was no longer capable if I were allowed, but the ministry of justice have decreed I have to rentire at age 72
Yes please. I'd be interested in any help in retraining and returning to the workplace. The extended age of retirement means I have almost another decade until I can retire. I haven't worked in a number of years so for all sorts of reasons a chance to get back to work would be welcome.
This makes me SO ANGRY !
What about those of us who DO NOT ASPIRE TO WORK INTO OUR 60'S, 70'S OR 80'S BUT MAY HAVE NO BLOODY WELL CHOICE ????????? 
When there is so little governement money around why would it make sense to waste it on education for someone in their 60's ?
......and for the record I don't agree with extending shared parental leave to grandparents either. What next? Uncles, aunts, sisters, brothers, the woman up the street? Ridiculous. How the hell would businesses keep going if everyone in them decided to take leave whenever they felt like it?
This has put me in a bad mood for the rest of the day now !
No thanks - I have got (and have had) quite enough to do caring for parents (now deceased) and GC, because family earn too little to be able to afford enough child care. I am also busy in a voluntary capacity in my local community doing stuff that the LA used to be able to afford to do.
I thought I was contributing to the economy by spending my pension on British food wherever possible, and supporting local businesses.
I would much rather the government concentrated on providing work opportunities for those who need them ie younger people.
Baby boomers are already subject to a lot of criticism for being the 'lucky' generation - this will add another layer to that, if the critics can complain we are now absorbing resources that would be better invested in the younger generation.
We recently saw a report from independent think tank Bright Blue advocating that the UK should have a higher proportion of people in their late sixties and seventies in work to boost individual and national prosperity. From the report:
Bright Blue calls on the Government to introduce new policies to ensure those who aspire to work when they are aged 65 or over are better supported. Bright Blue argues that if baby boomers in particular decide to work for a greater number of years they will be contributing enormously to the economy and helping to create more intergenerational fairness.
The current government has already adopted Bright Blue's recommended policy of enabling working grandparents to be entitled to Shared Parental Leave, so more older workers can stay in work and meet their family commitments.
Bright Blue is now calling for the introduction of a new lifetime Higher Education (HE) loan account for all adults to be able to obtain financial support to pay the tuition fees of HE courses to upskill and reskill throughout their working lives, so people are better able to work for longer later in life.
Our recent report advocated that all eligible adults from the UK and other EU aged 18 onwards should be entitled to access a lifetime HE tuition fee loan account from government to pay for tuition of any HE course - full-time or part-time - in England during their lifetime. This means that adults of whatever age could access this account to pay for equivalent or lower qualifications, or courses below a certain intensity.
Those who are older can currently access tuition fee loans for undergraduate courses, and in the future, those aged up to 60 will be able to access tuition fee loans for postgraduate courses. But these tuition fee loans are not available for those undertaking equivalent or lower qualifications, or those undertaking courses that are studied below a certain intensity of hours per week.
The amount in the lifetime loan account should be determined after extensive consultation led by government. It should take into account that the amount would have to be high enough to take into account people studying multiple degrees. However, the loan account should also be low enough to trigger price competition and, in particular, downward pressure on undergraduate tuition fees in England.
Similar to the current system, students will repay the amount they have borrowed from their lifetime loan account to the Student Loans Company through the PAYE system. This tuition fee loan will be separate and junior to the maintenance loan UK students can obtain for a first undergraduate degree.
We'd be very interested to know your thoughts on the report: whether you'd want to be in work into your 60s and 70s, whether a higher education loan would make you more likely to retrain - or maybe you're not tempted at all!
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.