Gransnet forums

Chat

How were babies put to bed in the 70s?

(59 Posts)
Purpletinofpaint Wed 24-Jul-19 19:17:41

I am absolutely unable to sleep lying on my back & it got me thinking...what were the 'rules' regarding putting your babies to sleep back in the 70s? When I had my dc in the 90s the rule was lay them on their backs to prevent cot death. I wonder if the general consensus was to place them on their fronts previously? What do you remember?

Fennel Thu 01-Aug-19 10:05:45

Mine were born in the '60s, I can't remember what Dr. Spock said - he was the 'expert' in those days.
Another safety point is not to give the baby a pillow or very soft mattress. And don't fall asleep when breast feeding in your own bed.
I think this applies to very young babies - as they get stronger they can change position themselves.

Anja Thu 01-Aug-19 07:27:50

In 1970 cot deaths averaged 1500 annually.

Thanks to the practice of putting babies to sleep on their backs, the number of cot deaths in England and Wales has fallen to the lowest since records began.

There were 128 sudden infant deaths in 2014, according to provisional data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

It’s not a case of ‘how things change’ ??? (crass stupidity) but fact backed by statistics.

ginny Tue 30-Jul-19 19:35:33

My three , always in their side or back. I never felt happy about putting them on their tummies except in the day, on the floor while I was there with them.
The ‘Back yo Sleep’ campaign does seem to have worked. Have you ever noticed on a hot night , how much hotter you feel sleeping on your tummy than on your back or side ?

Floradora9 Tue 30-Jul-19 18:07:15

Always swaddled in a blanket and on their sides. My own two plus foster babies always the same . I remember my aunt , a midwife , saying never on their backs . Just shows how things change.

grannygranby Mon 29-Jul-19 20:39:31

I remember my daughter liked to spreadeagle herself on her tummy with her bum in the air. My son was more of a back sleeper.

M0nica Mon 29-Jul-19 20:14:47

Early 70s, lie them on their tummies.

annodomini Mon 29-Jul-19 15:09:48

As DS2 had a misdiagnosed bowel abnormality, he was more comfortable on his front. Even in the big pram, he would insist on lying on his front. I had to keep the hood down so that he could do press-ups and look out the end. When he was 2, he had surgery and after that he could sleep any way he wanted. His brother always slept on his side, right from the start as that was how the midwives put him in the hospital.

grannylyn65 Mon 29-Jul-19 14:57:48

Early!

Lazigirl Mon 29-Jul-19 14:56:15

I agree Newmom101 that this advice is based on research and has saved many lives. Many of us had babies before this was known and I think most are just sharing their experiences. I don't give unasked for advice to my son about my grandchildren, although I was a health visitor for most of my working life. They prefer to look things up on the Internet. smile

lemongrove Mon 29-Jul-19 14:41:58

The prevailing view ( at the time!) was to put them into bed face down.I refused to do this, ( having tried it) as the baby
Looked hot and red faced.After that, put baby ( and subsequent babies) on their backs, they were able to turn their heads from side to side, and to look around, and stayed cooler.

LullyDully Mon 29-Jul-19 13:47:58

1978/1980 I put mine on their tummies to prevent them swallowing sick and to bring up the wind. I was shocked when I was told that I shouldn't have done that. Luckily they survived.

Anja Mon 29-Jul-19 10:37:03

I’m shocked at those who think this is just a ‘fashion’ ?

Anja Mon 29-Jul-19 10:35:38

Newmom101 the voice of informed common sense....at last!

annep1 Thu 25-Jul-19 16:19:51

I don't recall being given advice. I put them on their side. And changed sides for some reason??

Bellanonna Thu 25-Jul-19 15:59:34

1970 Side. Keep alternating
1972 Tummy

Newmom101 Thu 25-Jul-19 15:40:04

Reading through this thread I’m slightly concerned that the impression that a few posts might give is that placing babies to sleep on their front or side is fine as the posters babies were fine, and that the current guidelines are just a ‘fashion’ that may change again with time. I just wanted to point out placing babies on their backs to sleep is FAR safer than any other position, and has greatly reduced SIDS rates across the globe since its became widely publicised in the 80s/90s.

The SIDS rates in the UK were around 1800 babies a year in the late 80s before the ‘back to sleep’ campaign, after which they dropped to around 600 a year. Since then, and since the introduction of other safety factors (no blankets or cot bumpers and room sharing for 6 months) this has now dropped to around 240 a year. The statistics speak for themselves. Also, it has been the advice for over 30 years in some countries, certainly not a fashion or fad.

I only point this out as I would hate for a new mom to be looking for information online, read some of these posts and then think ‘oh it’s okay, I’ll try it’ in case something awful were to happen.

I understand a lot of the guidance (mainly weaning) has varied massively over the years, and there’s no definitive evidence for any specific weaning dates or practice (other than nothing than milk in babies bottles) but safe sleeping practice can quite literally save a child’s life. My cousin lost her son to SIDS at 6 months old and she tells everyone to follow all the SIDS advice now.

I’ve added a link to the lullaby trust and the lullaby trusts outline of the evidence base for the safe sleeping guidelines.

Lullaby trust: www.lullabytrust.org.uk/

Evidence base: www.lullabytrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Evidence-base-2019.pdf#page5

Witzend Thu 25-Jul-19 15:14:42

I had my first in 1977 and we were sternly told to put them to sleep on their tummies - the other way risked cot death.
Roll on ten years or so....

What with the advice on eggs as well, and diesel cars (it's not that long since we were told that they were better for the environment) I do tend to be a wee bit sceptical now of 'expert' advice, given that they change their minds all too often.

Franbern Thu 25-Jul-19 14:21:23

Oh Yes, swaddling. Always was, and still am a great believer in this for the first few weeks of life, slowly loosening it as they progress. My first g.child was the first baby I had come across that hated this and even did not really like covers however loose. He is 19 yrs now, and by the age of 6 yrs old was proven to be aspergers. Not sure if this has anything to do with his dislike of close covers, he still has that.
All other babies I came across/cared for I found swaddling tended to calm them down ready for sleep.
My own third one was premature, and due to circumstances I was unable to stay in hospital with her. Brought her home with me and used a very long length of material to drape around myself and her to keep her firm against me whilst I went round looking after the other two etc. As soon as she started to stir, she was offered the breast, if she actually woke and cried, she was then often too exhausted to feed, so during the day she was suckling for a short time about every two hours.
At night she slept in her crib next to my bed, on her tummy,and would be lifted by me to feed as necessary.
Yes fashions do change.

JoyBloggs Thu 25-Jul-19 12:07:03

I was told by the midwife to put our first baby (born 1977) on her side with a terry nappy rolled up behind her to prevent her rolling on to her back and I did the same with her siblings. The wicker crib had a horsehair mattress that was advised by the department store where we bought the crib. It was very firm!

My mother-in-law, (who had successfully reared 8!) advised swaddling. She said the baby had come from a 'tight place' and would be happier if wrapped up. I did parcel them up in a little flannelette sheet sometimes but don't know whether or not this helped... none of them were much trouble.

I find it strange that we mothers who gave birth in the same years should have been given different advice! Maybe a regional thing? confused

EllanVannin Thu 25-Jul-19 09:16:54

Mine slept on their sides as tinies until they were of age to find their own comfortable position.

luluaugust Thu 25-Jul-19 09:06:06

Katek I well remember the ears thing! I put mine on their side or back, it was suggested the eldest one was put on her front but I never felt happy with it.

Anja Thu 25-Jul-19 08:01:49

The Back to Sleep Campaign has cut cot deaths significantly.

Franbern Thu 25-Jul-19 07:57:19

My first child was born at end of 1969, my last (twins) in 1975. In between those dates I had two other children and from 1973 was fostering pre-adoption new borns. So between 1969 and 1984 cared for approx 40 new- born babies.
ALL slept on their tummies. Good quality mattress, NO PILLOWS UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
As has been said, there was serious concern regarding babies on their backs inhaling their own vomit. Side sleeping was okay, provided something prevented them rolling to their backs.
As a breastfeeding Councillor back then I did come across a couple of horrific Sudden death syndrome of babies. Still not sure if this was anything to do with sleeping on their fronts.
The babies I cared for included, prems, downs syndrome and very sicky ones. Mine were breastfed, but my foster babies forumula fed. Even the smallest managed to lift their heads and turn them from side to side when lying on their tums.
With my g.children, I obeyed current thinking and if I was responsible for them I put them on their backs, but never really felt comfortable with this.

MrsAllboys Wed 24-Jul-19 23:42:41

Mine ..1978-1982 were put on their sides on top of a visivent mattress (holes in the top part). This was to prevent them inhaling any secretions/posseting/vomit while they were too young to turn themselves over. I had these mattresses for carry cot, pram and cot and I made sure the babies slept always on their sides (but not with noses pressed in, although the special mattresses assisted breathing and drained away any secretions). It made sense to me at the time and to be honest it still seems sensible but I go along with the new thinking with my grandchildren as it is what their parents want. There are a lot of misshapen heads now though. Who knows, there may be a different school of thought when these children become parents!

TwiceAsNice Wed 24-Jul-19 22:56:05

Born 75 80 and 83. I put all of them on their sides with a rolled up terry nappy behind them. Never tried them on their fronts. They were all perfectly happy being side sleepers and did sometimes prefer to sleep on their backs when older, by which time cot death risk was much reduced