Gransnet forums

Health

No longer testing for CV.

(89 Posts)
absent Fri 13-Mar-20 21:23:16

If the "powers that be" have no idea how many people are actually infected, how do they expect to make effective plans for reducing and/or controlling infection?

etheltbags1 Fri 13-Mar-20 20:54:37

It has been changed to 1 week off for cold symptoms . I have worked throu a cold as I need the money. I did ring 111 who said it sounded like a normal cold

annep1 Fri 13-Mar-20 20:49:09

Interesting article although haven't read it all yet. (A favourite programme awaits me!)

www.google.com/amp/s/fortune.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-uk-response-boris-johnson/amp/

mumofmadboys Fri 13-Mar-20 20:46:51

If a person tested negative on one particular day there is no saying that say two days later they may have a positive test.

annep1 Fri 13-Mar-20 20:42:07

I understand it requires a lot of staff, but if the vast majority usually test negative, a lot of people, whole families in some cases, are going to spend time at home in isolation for nothing, with a huge cost in SSP and staff shortages in workplaces. Not to mention the worry involved wondering have you got it, or passed it on to others. It doesn't make sense. In my opinion, but of course I'm no expert.
Perhaps things to could be explained better.

Callistemon Fri 13-Mar-20 18:36:41

Where are we going to suddenly find all the scientists and laboratory workers, plus facilities, to test everyone who has symptoms which may or may not be COVID-19?

They are working flat out as it is.

Chestnut Fri 13-Mar-20 18:22:46

As I've said above people need to know whether they've had corona virus or they could later become a threat to older folk. This is madness.

Chestnut Fri 13-Mar-20 18:20:20

I agree annepl people should be tested otherwise how do you know you've got it or when you've recovered whether you've had it? That could be important if you need to mix with older folk later on. It could be another virus you've had and then you get CV later and become infectious to the oldies. That has not been thought through and is not good enough.

I'd be interested to know whether 111 asked them their ages and whether they had any health issues.

mumofmadboys Fri 13-Mar-20 18:14:05

It is a waste of time and resources to test anyone with symptoms of cold, cough and fever. Most people with coronavirus will have a mild self limiting illness and get better. If someone is really unwell and struggling to breathe then they will need medical intervention. At this stage the diagnosis will probably be confirmed by testing.

Greymar Fri 13-Mar-20 18:12:52

Oh never mind Anne, you are being a wet blanket and like Eeyore. That's what I have been told. Don't waste you time worrying it will deplete your seretonin. Thats another tip.

Instead enjoy Aldi, the empty streets and the cheap flights.

annep1 Fri 13-Mar-20 18:10:20

Thanks for replies. I'll pass that on tickingbird. My son has asthma.

vampirequeen Fri 13-Mar-20 18:02:44

Maybe the government want to stop counting ordinary people.

tickingbird Fri 13-Mar-20 18:02:29

I think you’re hospitalised when you start struggling for breath. The vast majority of people won’t need hospital care.

annep1 Fri 13-Mar-20 17:57:12

My son.and partner were sent home and are in isolation with symptoms. 111 tells them people are no longer being tested. They have to stay at home 7 days. Thats all the advice given (apart from handwashing etc ) Surely it's better to let people know if they have it or not. I don't understand this policy. And at what stage are you considered to be in need of hospitalisation, Seems a bit vague