Journalists including those at the BBC are entitled to express opinions when they disagree with politicians. It is there job to get answers from politicians who do their best to ignore anyone who questions them. Biased may be, but aren't we all biased especially when we feel that Cummings, Johnson, Trump etc. have gone too far,
I belong to several pro-EU facebook groups in particular Scientists for the EU, Open Britain and now Campaign to Rejoin the EU. They do tend to be ranting shops where people agree with each other. There are probably pro-Brexit groups to which I not belong.
Granset has a spectrum of different views and also we generally are pleasant to each other. Many of you want me to stop going on about Brexit. Rather than being asked to put up and shupt up I would appreciate constructive debate explaining why Leavers voted Leave and in the cold light of today why they still feel it is best to Leave. Then I may be persuaded to change my views.
Individuals have the right to change their minds, so why were millions denied the right to a "People's Vote" on Brexit. The winning margin was narrow, around 3 million voters from 2016 have since died, about the same number of younger voters are now eligible to vote on their future.
The solution to Northern Ireland is far from satisfactory. You will loose your EHIC card, farmers will be poorer, fishermen who have a case did sell quotas. We really do understand so much more than we did in 2016. Just tell me who aside from Cummings, Gove, Johnson and Rees-Mogg will benefit from Brexit.