Gransnet forums

Webchats

Q&A with The Archers' Tim Bentinck 31 March

(41 Posts)
LucyGransnet (GNHQ) Tue 17-Mar-15 16:44:48

We're very excited to have Tim Bentinck, aka David Archer, answering all your questions on The Archers, his new venture into children's fiction with the upcoming release of Colin The Campervan...and anything else you care to ask!

Timothy Bentinck is best known as the voice of David Archer in The Archers, which boasts 5 million listeners a day.

Tim's acting CV covers radio, TV, film and stage. From swashbuckling Tom Lacey in the 80s series By The Sword Divided, to starring with David Jason in The Royal Bodyguard, he has recently featured in Twenty Twelve, The Politician’s Husband, Eastenders, Lucan, Gangsta Granny and plays the Home Secretary in the forthcoming BBC spy series, The Game. He is also the voice of James Bond in The World Is Not Enough computer game and for 15 years was familiar to Londoners as the voice of “Mind the Gap” on the Piccadilly Line.

Of his debut children's book, Tim says: "When my two boys, Will and Jasper, were small, we had a campervan that was cold, rusty, and unreliable. The boys and I lovedit - my wife didn't. We dreamt of having enough money to turn it into a supercar. In 'Colin' that wish comes true."

Tim is now hard at work on his second book at his home in north London, where he lives with his wife Judy, a renowned milliner.

Visit Tim’s website for more information.

Thank you for all your questions which have been passed onto Tim.

Gracesgran Wed 18-Mar-15 16:40:12

I would just like to give you a little reassurance. We had a bypass built near our village which divided a farm in two but they seem to have survived. Worst hit were the local stables who had to find new routes to ride smile.

My question. Did you feel Elizabeth's and Shula's reaction to David deciding not to sell was in character and do you have any idea when the Archenders scripts will calm down?

Marmight Thu 19-Mar-15 03:37:16

I can't believe that David ever entertained even the notion of selling up and moving to the NE for the sake of an ailing MiL who could have been so easily accommodated in the Midlands shock. What did you think of this story line and what do you think of the present state of script writing? I have listened, on and off, to the Archers since I was a little girl in the '50's and must say I am disappointed in its gradual descent down the slippery slope to soapdom with its ridiculous story lines. I just liked it as a gentle story of country and farming folk, without all this latest nonsense grin
Good luck with your books

suzied Thu 19-Mar-15 06:36:16

I'm one of the less vocal who are enjoying the new direction of the Archers. I thought the Brookfield move a bit far fetched, but it's had lots of repercussions which have been dramatic. Do the more racy story lines make it more interesting / fun for the actors?

Leticia Thu 19-Mar-15 06:56:29

I am finding the current story lines are spoiling the programme. I could hardly be bothered to listen to the Brookfield move, it was such a waste of time when it clearly wasn't going to happen.
I hate the way that the script writers change characters to fit a story, e.g Elizabeth and Roy are not a couple who would even look at each other, apart from the work relationship.
I agree very much with Marmight.
Do the script writers/producers/production team take any account of the views of the listeners, who are very vocal in their criticisms?

Nelliemoser Thu 19-Mar-15 08:16:53

Hello David Tim I have also been a regular listener for years. I was also sceptical about the selling up of Brookfield ever happening. This was widely speculated about here on GN by us Archers fans.

Do the actors ever get any chance of influencing the script by suggesting that their character would never do or say or act in the manner the scriptwriters have written up for them?

Tell the script writers we don't need high dramatic stories. The Archers works on its characters and their, often irritating, consistencies in behaviour. That is just how real people behave.

My favourite episodes in recent years were about Jenny's reaction to Alice's marriage to Chris Carter and the realisation that Susan Horribin would become a family member. That was really funny and the sort of social comedy that keeps me listening.

Suggest your script writers look at our Archers threads, I think there are couple of them .They might enjoy reading our feedback and suggestions for future story lines.

Leticia Thu 19-Mar-15 08:37:08

You will find feedback and suggestions all over the Internet. I particularly like commenting on Twitter, as it happens. I would love to know if it is read.

chloe1984 Thu 19-Mar-15 09:00:32

Do you ever find yourself thinking " what would David do?" Over situations in your own life? By the way if you get the chance could you have a quiet word with Helen over her unsuitable partner .

GrannyRose Thu 19-Mar-15 18:45:13

Melodramatic storylines occasionally disrupt our own humdrum lives - and sometimes the impact on survivors is very profound. I just happened to listen while washing up as Tony was paralysed by sudden Spinal Cord Injury - which has affected our family. I was stunned. I anticipated an announcement "if affected by these issues" at the end pf the episode, but I don't think there was one. Please plug the support available from the Spinal Injuries Association, the inspired work of Spinal Research, and the need for continued physio after the NHS has done it's great patch-up work. Spinal Cord injury is relatively rare - and the effects need further publicity. Melanie Reid writes very evocatively in her articles in Saturday Times magazine. They can be hard to read - but we need her insight.

GrannyLondon Thu 19-Mar-15 23:28:21

North London! How ever do you get to Ambridge in time for the early morning milking?

I love the Archers & think the present story lines are great. I'm often heard bellowing at the radio while I'm doing the evening washing up.

I'm afraid David drives me nuts, in fact they nearly all do, but that's families for you. I'm sure you are lovely.

Candelle Fri 20-Mar-15 00:08:17

I, too, am a long-term listener but have been dismayed by the recent silly story-lines, sorry! Particularly galling was the 'flood'. I thought the Archers tried to be true to seasons/happenings etc., but Borsetshire seems to have been flooded in a very special way! Not your fault, obviously but perhaps you can relate my ire to the producers!

It was obvious that David would not leave Brookfield, thank goodness! Ruth, however, is a different matter. Are you sure she wouldn't be better employed looking after her mother.....?! Just a thought.

Please tell the scriptwriters to concentrate on intense characterisation: we want to know/love/hate Ambridge folk. Silly superfluous story lines just don't do it for some of us.

Oh, when is Rob going to have his comeuppance?! We can't wait!

Many thanks for a mostly enjoyable part of our day.

Regards

Leticia Fri 20-Mar-15 07:13:28

Rob's comeuppance is one story that I actually like.
Why did they come out from linking the story to seasons/happenings? I was irritated that when swathes of the country were underwater the winter before this one Ambridge went happily on as normal and then , after a very dry winter, it starts to rain one day and they have a catastrophic flood!

ScouseEm Fri 20-Mar-15 14:19:57

Hi Tim, well done on the book! What made you decide to write it? why a childrens one rather than an adults? what was the inspiration behind it?
Also, what age group would it be suitable for?
thank you.

Marmight Mon 23-Mar-15 07:53:44

I see (having Googled you!) that you were born in Tasmania. Have you ever returned to your roots? I am in NSW on a prolonged visit and have visited Tassie in the past and just love it.

eGJ Thu 26-Mar-15 20:04:37

Why, oh WHY has Hazel (a new voiced one) returned??? No one's favourite EVER? shock

papaowen Mon 30-Mar-15 14:38:34

Well done on the new career! If it was writing or The Archers, which would you choose? Do you have any other hidden talents hidden up your sleeve that we may see emerging in future?

Esmeralda Tue 31-Mar-15 15:31:52

Hi Tim,
Congratulations on the new book. I read that you made up the story for your children when they were small, what do they think of seeing their story in print? Maybe we will see you at some VW festivals in the summer, that would be fun ...

Leticia Sat 04-Apr-15 07:07:40

Did I miss something? I thought this was for last Tuesday. Were there answers?

Leticia Sat 04-Apr-15 09:04:08

Anyone know?

suzied Sat 04-Apr-15 17:40:24

Perhaps he was too busy doing that flood meeting....

TimBentinck Tue 14-Apr-15 11:11:45

Gracesgran

I would just like to give you a little reassurance. We had a bypass built near our village which divided a farm in two but they seem to have survived. Worst hit were the local stables who had to find new routes to ride smile.

My question. Did you feel Elizabeth's and Shula's reaction to David deciding not to sell was in character and do you have any idea when the Archenders scripts will calm down?

Hi Gracegran, thanks for the reassurance, I’ll pass it on. Sorry for your bypass though! To answer your question, well I have two sisters of my own, and they’re not as well off as David’s sisters so they’d probably have been pretty annoyed, but when my wife and I nearly moved two years ago, the sister who lives near us was hugely relieved, because we’re a very loving family. I think David was very pleasantly surprised and touched by their reaction.

I’ve never seen Archenders, what is it?!

TimBentinck Tue 14-Apr-15 11:13:21

Marmight

I can't believe that David ever entertained even the notion of selling up and moving to the NE for the sake of an ailing MiL who could have been so easily accommodated in the Midlands shock. What did you think of this story line and what do you think of the present state of script writing? I have listened, on and off, to the Archers since I was a little girl in the '50's and must say I am disappointed in its gradual descent down the slippery slope to soapdom with its ridiculous story lines. I just liked it as a gentle story of country and farming folk, without all this latest nonsense grin
Good luck with your books

Thanks for the good luck message Marmight. I think that if it were real life, then it’s entirely plausible that a farmer and his family, given the situation, would think about moving. If you look back at the programme’s history, Phil threatened to divide the farm equally in 2000 and David and Ruth threatened to move to Normandy and farm there. So there is absolutely a precedent for them leaving Brookfield under extreme circumstances.

It really wasn’t about the mother-in-law, it was an entirely practical decision, which real farmers I’ve spoken to have endorsed, about how to survive as a dairy farmer in the present economic climate. I think more difficult is the notion that David and Ruth will be able to continue to be viable by staying. Who knows what fascinating stories in the future will allow them to keep their herd? I’m afraid I’m as in the dark as you!

TimBentinck Tue 14-Apr-15 11:19:27

suzied

I'm one of the less vocal who are enjoying the new direction of the Archers. I thought the Brookfield move a bit far fetched, but it's had lots of repercussions which have been dramatic. Do the more racy story lines make it more interesting / fun for the actors?

Hi Suzied.

All the people I meet and Archers-mad friends agree with you. The story was carefully crafted to endorse the core traditional values of what the programme is all about. It wasn’t about whether they would move up north, but the absolutely believable and moving and real reasons why they didn’t. When David came to his senses, having read his granddad’s journals, and remembered his father’s words, he was aghast at how he had so nearly betrayed everything that he had been entrusted with, and his speech about ‘I am a farmer’ was really what the whole thing had been leading up to. We knew very well that a lot of people were going to be annoyed, and that the core values were threatened, but it was done with the intention of reminding the listener of what those values were. Sort of ‘you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone’.

For your other question, well, I’m an actor and yes of course I like good writing, good actors to work with, and very high production values, ‘racy’ or not! I’m so privileged to be allowed to be a small part of this amazing programme.

TimBentinck Tue 14-Apr-15 11:20:24

Leticia

I am finding the current story lines are spoiling the programme. I could hardly be bothered to listen to the Brookfield move, it was such a waste of time when it clearly wasn't going to happen.
I hate the way that the script writers change characters to fit a story, e.g Elizabeth and Roy are not a couple who would even look at each other, apart from the work relationship.
I agree very much with Marmight.
Do the script writers/producers/production team take any account of the views of the listeners, who are very vocal in their criticisms?

Hi Leticia

Ah, well I hope I’ve answered some of your points in the above response. In answer to your last question though, yes they do take account of criticism, but they also take account of that other ‘imposter’, praise, too!

TimBentinck Tue 14-Apr-15 11:21:43

Nelliemoser

Hello David Tim I have also been a regular listener for years. I was also sceptical about the selling up of Brookfield ever happening. This was widely speculated about here on GN by us Archers fans.

Do the actors ever get any chance of influencing the script by suggesting that their character would never do or say or act in the manner the scriptwriters have written up for them?

Tell the script writers we don't need high dramatic stories. The Archers works on its characters and their, often irritating, consistencies in behaviour. That is just how real people behave.

My favourite episodes in recent years were about Jenny's reaction to Alice's marriage to Chris Carter and the realisation that Susan Horribin would become a family member. That was really funny and the sort of social comedy that keeps me listening.

Suggest your script writers look at our Archers threads, I think there are couple of them .They might enjoy reading our feedback and suggestions for future story lines.

Hi Nelliemoser

No. We have no say whatsoever, apart from tinkering with bits of dialogue here and there to make it a bit more readable sometimes. I often have to give out advice to farmers, not as much now as they did in the 50’s thank goodness, and that can be hard to get it to trip off the tongue!

‘High dramatic stories’? Well, ‘twas ever thus – just look back over the programme’s history, these things go in waves. David will be back to the milking soon, the Flower and Produce show will be upon us, and Lynda will be recruiting for the panto as normal. I personally thought the flood omnibus was some of the most realistic and moving bits of radio drama I’ve heard for years. And it is a drama series after all, it’s story, and we try to make it the best storytelling we can. Don’t panic Mr Mainwaring!