There is a qualitative difference between so-called female circumcision and male circumcision. I don't approve of the latter except for medical reasons and would want to see it banned in this country, just as the law here does not permit cropping dogs' ears. Female circumcision causes all kinds of medical problems and is a direct result of the desire to control female sexuality. (If a woman experiences severe pain and a total lack of pleasure during intercourse, she is unlikely to be "licentious", so that way you know that your sons are your sons.) Problems resulting from poor hygiene, especially during the actual process of circumcision, urination, menstruation and childbirth are horrific.
From anecdotal evidence, circumcised males do not generally find intercourse less satisfactory than their uncircumcised fellows and certainly not painful.