Gransnet forums

AIBU

To think that a 25 yard shooting range on the Palace of Westminster should not be maintained and staffed at the taxpayers expense?

(43 Posts)
MiceElf Tue 29-Jan-13 08:24:12

Alternative suggestions for how it could be used please. These could then be forwarded to Lord Tyler who this week posed the question.

gracesmum Tue 29-Jan-13 14:00:26

Not just Eric Pickles although he would be too easy a target - huuuuuge!
We could just get them to form an orderly queuegrin

j07 Tue 29-Jan-13 14:25:48

I'll go along with that Mey. smile

JessM Tue 29-Jan-13 17:20:20

As sporting facilities go it is not exactly designed to improve the fitness of employees is it. I wonder how much it actually gets used? grin

Stansgran Tue 29-Jan-13 18:06:52

They probably have cages with pheasants somewhere in the dungeons and every so often a menial lets a few out and then they bag a few for lunch. I really don't mind them having subsidized food as long as it is very basic and healthy and they are force fed their five a day. But no subsidised alcohol . If we can't have it as cheap as they do then I think the place should be teetotal and they might get something done.

absent Tue 29-Jan-13 18:12:09

Stansgran Have you any idea what is spent on stocking the wine cellar each year?

Nonu Tue 29-Jan-13 18:16:42

Hell of a lot !!!!

Ariadne Tue 29-Jan-13 18:20:17

Maybe they could take it in turns to be the targets???

gracesmum Tue 29-Jan-13 18:31:17

I think that's the way my mind was working......................grin They could even invite the likes of Tony Blair (+missus) and Gordon Brown.....grin again

vampirequeen Tue 29-Jan-13 18:45:46

Take away all their perks. Let them pay for them like the rest of us. I agree some companies provide gyms etc but then the taxman takes a chunk saying that it's a payment in kind.

Nelliemoser Tue 29-Jan-13 19:10:48

Its disgraceful! When working in local government we didn't get luxuries at all.
Subsidized canteens were all closed by 1999! We even had to buy our own "post it" notes in the end.
At one point staff were told that they could no longer the first floor of the offices to watch the town carnival as it was not fair to local residents for us get such a privilege.

j07 Tue 29-Jan-13 19:15:05

My son works at the Met Office. That's government owned. Got a free gym.

absent Tue 29-Jan-13 19:16:37

It wasn't long ago (two or three months?) when some MP was claiming that the food in the subsidised restaurants was too expensive. You do wonder if they come from a different planet sometimes, don't you? hmm

Deedaa Tue 29-Jan-13 21:28:31

From the shooting ranges I have seen I can't imagine the cost of upkeep can be very great, I think a clamp down on spending on food and drink would be far more of a saving. And what about all that first class travel? If there is a security problem let them go by car, if not let them see what the rest of us have to put up with.

NfkDumpling Wed 30-Jan-13 05:54:45

I agree with Deedaa. The shooting range seems a good way to relieve the pressure from a frustrating job and there are probably a lot more, more expensive perks which should be abolished first. A lot more.

Bags Wed 30-Jan-13 11:12:37

I think they should take up archery instead. They wouldn't need ear-protectors.

Bags Wed 30-Jan-13 11:13:35

Ancient and noble British tradition of the long bow and all that wink

NfkDumpling Wed 30-Jan-13 20:59:07

They could dress up in Lincoln Green and put feathers in their caps. It would lighten up the drear monotony of the afternoon session. (Boris would approve)