Gransnet forums

AIBU

Euthanasia at aged 44

(57 Posts)
Riverwalk Wed 02-Oct-13 10:02:07

AIBU to be alarmed that a young man of 44 felt that this was the only way to relieve his suffering, and that a doctor was willing to do the deed?

Euthanasia

thatbags Wed 02-Oct-13 16:05:34

People who want to have control at the end of their lives may be interested in following www.dignityindying.org.uk/. There are parallel campaigns/movements in South Africa and Canada that I know about. There may be others too. I plan to have in place an Advance Directive for if I ever lose my ability to make my choices known.

thatbags Wed 02-Oct-13 16:05:58

Agreed, petallus.

Ana Wed 02-Oct-13 16:23:05

Thanks for the link, thatbags.

Penstemmon Wed 02-Oct-13 16:57:28

I agree that it is sad that anyone finds themselves in a situation to be considering suicide /euthanasia. But at 44 perhaps the thought of struggling for anther 44 years with his mental trauma and physical difficulties was truly unbearable and he and the decision that was right for him.

I believe we should be able to make that decision for ourselves when e are fit to do so. Thanks for the links.

Mishap Wed 02-Oct-13 18:34:27

It does sound as though this poor man did not have proper counselling before surgery. Being the "girl that no-one wanted" as a child could simply be a psychological problem rather than a true need to change gender. And it does sound as though the surgery was not well performed, even if it had been appropriate. How sad for this poor man.

I do agree that there needs to be provision for euthanasia in certain situations; but it is very disturbing indeed to see euthanasia being regarded as appropriate when the source of the trauma has been deliberately inflicted by so-called professionals.

FlicketyB Wed 02-Oct-13 20:33:58

Why euthanasia? Why couldn't he just commit suicide?

Ana Wed 02-Oct-13 20:43:14

Suicide attempts aren't always successful. Perhaps he wanted a guaranteed safe exit.

Iam64 Thu 03-Oct-13 08:24:28

I was surprised when I saw the headlines, that a doctor would help someone end their life in these circumstances. Having read more, I felt relieved that this man was helped to end a life he was finding unbearable. Suicide attempts sometimes fail, or leave the person in a worse situation than they were before. I hope it helped this man to feel cared for during the preparation for his death. Counselling isn't a cure all and not all problems can be solved by it. His situation seems very different than the ones where individuals are overwhelmed by depression/anxiety or other mental health problems at different points in life. His whole life seems to have been tough for this person.

grannyactivist Thu 03-Oct-13 11:29:50

Too close to home for me to comment right now. sad

Jendurham Thu 03-Oct-13 11:52:46

My husband had an advance directive, and died using it when he'd had enough.
In this country you have to have two appropriately qualified doctors agree that there will be no prospect of recovery. He still had to stop eating and drinking. He would probably have preferred euthanasia as it took 3 days to die after the GP agreed I need not feed him any more.
In the case above, there is no mention of any other medical person being involved. It also does not really give a timescale, which is worrying. Had he decided that he wanted euthanasia if things went wrong before the started the change?

Iam64 Thu 03-Oct-13 12:05:24

GA (sad)

Riverwalk Thu 03-Oct-13 12:18:10

All very well saying it's his life, his body, free to do as he pleases, etc but if I passed someone who was about to jump off a bridge I don't think I'd just let them get on with it, without intervening somehow.

I wonder if he received proper psychotherapy, not counselling, to help him deal with the rejection by his mother.

I think there is a difference between the suffering of psychological and physical illness - if you have an inoperable tumour and all other treatment has failed then you know that's it, nothing more can be done, but a psychological illness has the potential for a cure.

Iam64 Thu 03-Oct-13 12:34:43

I may be wrong, but I have faith that this young man felt he'd exhausted all therapeutic attempts to support him, whether they were physical or psychological. I used counselling as a blanket term - but assume this chap had psychiatric, psychological and psychotherapeutic input before any surgery was offered.
Talking someone down from a building, bridge etc is dealing with someone at the height of crisis. This man will have had more than a quick chat with some medic or other before this decision could have been made.

whenim64 Thu 03-Oct-13 12:40:04

ga I hope things are improving flowers

annodomini Thu 03-Oct-13 13:34:19

Riverwalk, we need to reflect that for some the ultimate 'cure' for a psychological illness could be to end it all.

petallus Thu 03-Oct-13 14:10:56

If I finally plucked up the courage to jump off a bridge I might not be pleased if a stranger prevented me doing so.

I am reminded of the attitude the Samaritans took, at least when I was with them years ago.

We were instructed to talk to someone who was contemplating suicide, with the aim of disuading them from doing so, but if they went ahead during the phone call we were not to try to trace where they were and send an ambulance unless they gave their permission. We were to talk to them until they lost consciousness prior to death.

Riverwalk Thu 03-Oct-13 14:35:40

I live next to a bridge and a few times over the past 10 years when walking across it on my way home from work at around 21.00 I've seen people standing alone right next to the parapet, totally lost in thought and staring out. Could be just taking in the view of course or about to take a photograph but some people just have a very forlorn look.

If I saw someone about to climb over I would have to stop and say a few gentle words.

One bright sunny morning a couple of years ago a young man did climb over and was sitting on a ledge - it must have happened a few minutes before I was intending to walk over the bridge. The police stopped all traffic and pedestrians on the bridge and on both sides of the embankment, and river traffic - it was like a ghost town, totally silent.

He was persuaded down and I've always hoped that he was happy with this outcome.

janeainsworth Thu 03-Oct-13 16:43:24

Jen I agree, the article mentions only one doctor - Wim Distelmans - and goes on to describe him as 'a cancer doctor' who also ended the lives of two twins who were deaf and could not face the risk of going blind too.
To me, that is quite different from someone in intolerable physical pain for whom there is no prospect of recovery, and I have to say he seems quite sinister.
Anno yes, I knew a young man who took that view.

vampirequeen Thu 03-Oct-13 17:06:32

I have checks and balances in place to help to protect me from myself. I make sure I never stockpile meds or have good quality sharps to hand. However no matter how I try to protect myself there is always a chance I will find a way. If that should even happen I hope to God that someone intervenes rather than think it's none of their business.

According to the report this man was killed on the agreement of one doctor when other doctors had already turned him down. It worries me that it only took one doctor to do the deed. The others obviously thought that the man could have been helped in some way but once the deed is done there is no going back. Who knows what might have happened. Maybe they could have repaired his penis and altered his breasts. Perhaps he needed more counselling to come to terms with the changes that had been made. Of course it's possible that he would never cope and still seek to die but surely not on the agreement of just one doctor. It just strikes me as wrong that one person should wield such power of life or death.

Jendurham Thu 03-Oct-13 19:05:53

I came out of hospital with 200 paracetamol, 60 codeine and 60 Nefopam.
Better not get depressed, as I still have most of them.

Vampirequeen, in this country it would not be possible for that to happen unless at least two doctors agreed. In fact, it can only be for physical reasons, I think. At least that's what Ken's advance directive says.

I keep thinking I ought to sign one myself, as I know my GP would witness it, because of the ticking timebomb I have. However, it would mean discussing it with my sons, and they are still upset about their dad dying that way.

My brother-in-law and his wife had the right idea, of doing them together.
Nobody ever knows when they need them.

harrigran Thu 03-Oct-13 19:12:01

ga flowers

Iam64 Fri 04-Oct-13 08:29:27

Jendurham - very thought provoking, sensitively written post (flowers)

Mishap Fri 04-Oct-13 11:08:38

I was not thinking of counselling as a route to dissuading this young man from his course of action in ending his life; but I did feel that it might have been appropriate for him to have had better counselling at the point where he was choosing to change his sex. It is a huge step to take and has had such dreadful consequences for him.

As a social worker, I had the difficult experience of visiting a lady who gave no hint that she wished to end her life, but as soon as I left she committed suicide. As you might guess, I spent a very long time agonising over our conversation and trying to isolate any clues that I might have missed, or anything that I had said that might have contributed to her decision.

Taking one's own life has dreadful consequences for those left behind, so a full discussion beforehand with those who might be affected and a proper drawing up of a statement of wishes is very important. Lives are ruined by the sudden and unexpected suicide of a loved one.

Jendurham Fri 04-Oct-13 11:20:00

That's why assisted suicide is such an awful phrase, but I do not know what else to call it.
If it's called any form of suicide, those left behind are left with the idea that the person who died did not want to live with them anymore.
But that is not true. They only take the final step because they cannot live as they are.
Sorry, have to stop. Crying again.

Mishap Fri 04-Oct-13 13:16:26

Jen - there are clearly circumstances when an ending of a life in a gentle way after proper discussion with those they love and who love them has to be the right thing. As you say, it is not about not wanting to live with them, but not being able to live as they are. A terminal illness with unbearable pain is just such an instance; and it is right and proper that there should be ways of helping people with this. It is unbearably sad, but undoubtedly right, and those relatives who support their loved one in this decision are to be greatly commended. I admire your bravery and am sorry that euthanasia was not available and that the end was so slow.

Sudden unexpected suicides leave such pain behind - Should I have known this was going to happen? - was there something I could have done? etc.

The debate about euthanasia needs to continue until some satisfactory answer is achieved. It parteicularly disturbs me that some religious organisations allow their beliefs to prevent people being able to do what is right and proper, and that they skew the debate in this nation with an established church.