It seems to be assumed that the Grenfell people who are concerned there is no non-white representatives on the inquiry panel are somehow being irrational or, as gillybob claims, racist in making that assumption.
It is perhaps because of their experience of being non-white in a predominantly white society that has caused them to arrive at this conclusion. There has been a great deal of research that supports those feelings, i.e. that if you are non-white there is a reasonable chance that you will be treated less fairly within the education, employment, housing and justice systems.
That does not mean that every white person is racist and likely to consciously discriminate against non-white people, but there is a chance that they may be - and there is a very good chance that white people are unaware of the petty acts of prejudice and stereotyping, which impact upon people's lives in very real ways. They cheerily say that there is no racism these days, when they really are not the people to make such proclamations since they are not the ones experiencing it. Most non-white people can give you examples of racism that have, at best, hurt, embarrassed or offended them or, at worst, meant they have received unequal treatment.
That being the case, and given the woeful response to this tragedy, is it any wonder that many people view the inquiry, and the make up of its panel, with suspicion? Even if they are completely mistaken in their belief that this lack of non-white representation will impact upon the eventual findings, they perceive this to be the case and it seems reasonable to me that some effort should be made to meet their request.