Eloethan
Lolo81 Your interpretation of the OP's post is debatable. I don't think she is suggesting her daughter in law doesn't care about the health of her baby, I think she feels that many posters on here are unduly critical of the OP's concerns. The open hasn't been critical of her daughter in law. Indeed, she said that they get on well. She is just concerned and asked people's opinions as to whether to mention it and, if so, how to do so tactfully.
There have been many pieces of reputable research which have warned against the use of chemical cleaning products, and, in particular, spray products. Some researchers have suggested that the damage to a person's lungs can be equivalent to smoking several cigarettes a day.
I repeat that other posts where the issue of smoking anywhere in the vicinity of babies and children, or even adults, has been raised, there has been outrage and condemnation of the practice.
I admit this may be a retort to us on GN, but if OP thinks this here then I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think that translates to IRL.
My point is that as much as she is capable of research, concern etc to frame it that way should she decide to actually verbalise IRL is a sure fire way to get her DIL’s back up.
Realistically, how would any woman receive their MIL criticising how she cleans her home? To then frame it as -I’m the only one that’s thinking about the welfare of the baby - ....
It’s a very tricky road to plough. My point is that framing it in this way is not helpful at all and should be avoided.