Germanshepherdsmum
Baggs it seems to echo that awful phrase ‘we are pregnant’. Perhaps uttering said phrase could be made an offence, preferably carrying a heavy sentence.
I don't think it should be made an offence, gsm; I just think people should try to be unambiguous. Fat chance of that in today's linguistic contortions, I know, but one can wish upon a cloud.
Some thoughts:
When it is said that ‘they’ are pregnant of a couple, several interpretations are possible without further information. If the couple consists of a man and a woman, it means they are expecting (that is, awaiting) the birth of a baby. Only one of them is pregnant. If the couple is two women it begins to get more complicated. ‘They’ are pregnant could have the same meaning as the above example, especially if one of the women is a transwoman, but it could also mean that two biological women are pregnant/expecting: awaiting the birth of two babies. If the couple is a man and a transman, I think it means the transman is pregnant though, as usual, the couple is awaiting the birth of a baby. If the couple is two transmen the same interpretations as for the two women are possible.
I think.
But why use language ambiguously when there are perfectly clear ways of expressing the meaning? I think it’s control freakery.