I would personally prefer relatives 20 mins or a bit more away. I would not like them to just keep on popping in.
I can see the benefits of being close if you are looking after an agèd relative for example - or someone you care about who suffers from, say, serious mental illness - but I'd still rather be able to have a (kindly) break from them and not feel that they will be upset if we have cars arriving and they aren't part of things. I'd also rather not feel these relatives have to come along with me if I'm going out. I don't always want family to "do" everything with me.
It would be hard to exclude someone from say, a barbecue or birthday or just a casual get-together if they were just two doors away. Sometimes I want to be able to socialise with people I want to socialise with, not a cousin or a great aunt no matter how much I love them.
And yes, I do love them... and in small and not so small ways we all share this love. We each love and support each other (better I think than many "in your pocket" families), and regularly make the one hour, two hour, 45 minute, 20 minute, journeys to do this.
So GrammyGrammy on behalf of other "not-in-the-pocket" families and those of us who did cut apron strings, I find your remarks offensive and just wrong
Why do you all like living your tiny little lives alone in your little boxes keeping blood relatives away and out of things? I find this resentful, withholding, distancing and lack of familial care and love and warmth disgusting
Firstly, I don't think we have "tiny little lives" what makes you think that? And why do you think we are "alone"? Maybe if we were alone we might like it better!
Just because you don't want to live in someone's pocket does not mean you are resentful, or withholding or distancing and it certainly doesn't mean you have a lack of familial care and love and warmth.
I'm with M0nica on this one. If it's true, and the agent will know if it is, I'd find another house if it's not too late.