biglouis
It can be argued that £50 discriminates against single people - as so much does in our society! I wonder how many single pensioners can afford £50 for groceries. I assume they manage by doing a less frequent shop. As a planner I prefer my shopping day to be regular and am awaiting my Tesco order now as I write this.
I can easily spend £50 per week on shopping just for myself but if I find myself a few pounds short I just buy something I know I am going to need "sometime" like wash up liquid, loo roll or dish cloths.
And I do treat myself to a bottle of wine every week for when my nephew comes down and cooks a meal.
It is interesting that those ordering for two find thse limits reasonable while those ordering for one recognise the difficulty of reaching £50.
I am one of those single pensioners, and my freezer and cuoboards are full of stores bought to top up an order so as to avoid spending another £5 on nothing. I don't drink much wine, and I run my washing machine only once a week, so I don't need either of those bill-fillers.
I used to walk down the hill to the small co-op and buy a few things in between fortnightly shops The walk back up the hill stopped me buying the whole shopping there, even with it all in my trusty trolley (I long ago stopped going to Lidl and humphing it all back on the bus and up the hill, in said trusty trolley)
As prices rose (and the order minimum went up from £25 to £40 then £50) I found that if I did that I then didn't need them in my online order and couldn't make it up to the minimum, so I stopped using the co-op and just bought everything in one go.
This had two results - it removed my custom from the co-op and gave it all to Tesco, and it removed my incentive to put on my shoes and coat and walk down the road and back.