Email addresses, wives using their husbands’.

I'm involved with several local charitable/political groups and find that several committee members/group leaders either do not understand the importance of the GDPR rules or do not know how to avoid falling foul of them. For instance, if you are sending group emails (say to 20 members of a u3a interest group) you must use a method that does not identify the email address of other members (usually dealt with using the "blind copy" function). This also clearly applies if the membership secretary emails members who have failed to renew their subs. Similarly with the political organisation - some might have good reason for others not to know their political affinity.

Nothing😀.

I wasn’t suggesting they could, or should do anything about it. My points were that it is not always the case that people who are doing something are doing it happily, and that we can’t assume that what are, to us, benign communications will necessarily be so to others.